Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 18 → 20 of 106
1 category · RankedSweep
64Judge labels
7First choices
7Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in ESG and carbon reporting for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 110 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
6 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 23 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Sweep →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business22 of 110
0%21 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 110
10%23 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise6 of 86
2%20 labels
accepted challenger
In esg and carbon reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Sweep for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESG and carbon reporting | Equity and corporate | 10% | 2 of 110 | 4% | 23 | accepted challenger | ▼−15Since September 2026: 25% → 10%, −15 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Sweep moved past the floor in its one category, ESG and carbon reporting, −15 points to 10%.
Best category · ESG and carbon reporting · by segment
Mid-market▼−15Since September 2026: 25% → 10%, −15 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 25% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 5 pointsRank 1 → 2 of 96
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 4 → 6 of 75
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESG and carbon reporting | 25% | 10% | ▼−15Since September 2026: 25% → 10%, −15 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 1 → 2 of 110 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Sweep across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Sweep across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labels7
Paraphrase11 labelsNone
Comparative23 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative64 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Sweep is frequently highlighted as the best ESG reporting software for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · first choice
“Sweep or Greenly edge out for pure mid-market B2B value based on these sources.” Grok 4.1 Fast · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · first choice
“Sweep — Best for mid-market companies building a carbon management programme” Muse Glimmer 30B · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · first choice
“The best ESG reporting software for a mid-market B2B company is Sweep” Llama 4 Maverick · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“up to enterprise quotes for Sweep, IBM Envizi, and Workiva” Muse Glimmer 30B · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sweep, over the 64 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sweep was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sweep, over the 64 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sweep was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sweep. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 64 answers that named Sweep and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
onestopesg.com47
fanruan.com25
guideflow.com25
coolset.com24
tracera.com22
techtarget.com19
pulsora.com18
manglai.io17
emissiontwin.com16
g2.com16
229 of the 229 domain citations in answers naming Sweep came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sweep.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sweep takes 10% of first choices and Greenly takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sweep.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sweep takes 10% of first choices and Greenly takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “esg reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “esg reporting platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 33,100 a month (“sweep”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 41,121 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,225 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,377 · 49 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,637
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
10%
rank 2 of 110 in ESG and carbon reporting
Segment leader
36%
Greenly
- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 64 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 63 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sweep.net
1,523
subdomains included
Content
841
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
6 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 375 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | Accounting software, Financial reporting | |
| Conference or event | 119 | 1 | 2026-07-07 | ||
| Case study | 105 | 0 | 2026-06-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 85 | 1 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| News or press | 81 | 3 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 39 | 0 | 2026-04-17 | ||
| Comparison | 20 | 2 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Template or tool | 10 | 2 | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | 0 | 2025-11-13 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Fixing your sustainability data guide report or ebook
- 2026-09-0994 of business leaders report climate related financial losses yet 79 lack the data to inform business strategy news or press
- 2026-09-03Uk srs vs secr comparison
- 2026-09-02Ai anomaly detection in carbon data blog
- 2026-08-31Sweep integrates merieux nutrisciences blonks agri footprint flag data into its factors library news or press
- 2026-08-31Sweep integrates merieux nutrisciences blonks agri footprint flag data into its factors library news or press
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 1, 2026Atelier animé par Renaud BettinSalle 341, Paris · spoke
- September 30, 2026 to October 1, 2026Retrouvez Sweep à PRODURABLE 2026Palais des Congrès de Paris, Paris · exhibited
- September 30, 2026Petit-déjeuner avec BearingPointParis · spoke
- September 30, 2026Panel avec Julien DenormandieAmphi Havane, Paris · spoke
- March 30, 2026Sweep Afterwork drinks – ChangeNow 2026Balcony 2, Grand Palais, Paris · hosted
- March 12, 2026EY x Sweep Tech Roadshow 2026Paris · hosted
- October 9, 2025Rejoignez Sweep à Produrable du 8 au 9 Octobre 2025Paris · exhibited
- October 8, 2025Rejoignez Sweep à Produrable du 8 au 9 Octobre 2025Paris · exhibited
As the event pages on sweep.net state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sweep.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Sweep
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Sweep is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Sweep is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the sustainability intelligence platform that turns sustainability data into measurable business performance
- For
- Complex organizations; ambitious sustainability teams; finance teams
- Certifications
- SOC certifiedISO 27001-compliant
- Customers named
- SSE plcSwisscomMV Credit Partners LLPSSEBBGIComposites OneEkinopsVimian Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Sweep's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sweep.net, trust.sweep.net, sweep.net/platform, sweep.net/customers, sweep.net/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sweep's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sweep, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sweep by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Sweep is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sweep, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Sweep is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Sweep is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideSweep is among the products AI models recommend first in ESG and carbon reporting this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.