Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 42 of 64, unchanged
FMIS · 1 category · Named, not rankedFMIS Fixed Assets
7Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. FMIS Fixed Assets was named 1 time in Lease accounting, where FinQuery led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market46 of 71
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named FMIS Fixed Assets for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 46 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, FMIS Fixed Assets held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Lease accounting · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 46 of 71, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated FMIS Fixed Assets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated FMIS Fixed Assets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as FMIS Fixed Assets, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FMIS Fixed Assets was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as FMIS Fixed Assets, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FMIS Fixed Assets was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FMIS Fixed Assets. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named FMIS Fixed Assets and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
capterra.com5
softwareadvice.com3
g2.com2
softwareconnect.com2
acquisition-international.com1
asset.accountant1
assetcues.com1
facilio.com1
gartner.com1
getapp.com1
Eighteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming FMIS Fixed Assets came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as FMIS Fixed Assets
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FMIS Fixed Assets; a claim can dispute any of them.
FMIS Fixed Asset Management 1
Follow FMIS Fixed Assets
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
FMIS is the company behind FMIS Fixed Assets.ShowHide
The company
FMIS is the company behind FMIS Fixed Assets.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- FMIS Fixed Assets version 12.47 adds more flexible indexation, additional G/L reconciliation options and clearer information for organisations managing assets across multiple companies.
- For
- finance teams that use indexation, reconcile asset postings using FMIS reports or manage fixed assets across several companies
- Customers named
- AccountMateAccountMate Software CorporationDoncasters Group Ltd.Doncasters Ltd
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What FMIS Fixed Assets's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: fmis.co.uk/fmis-fixed-assets-version-12-47, fmis.co.uk/accountmate-fixed-asset-integration-with-fmis, fmis.co.uk/doncasters-consolidate-fixed-asset-management, fmis.co.uk/fixed-asset-management-for-accountmate-software, fmis.co.uk/about-fmis-fixed-asset-management-software-solutions. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FMIS Fixed Assets's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FMIS Fixed Assets, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for FMIS Fixed Assets by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where FMIS Fixed Assets is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name FMIS Fixed Assets, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.