Every category where a model named Futrli for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	0%	36 of 101	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	53 of 102	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	49 of 74	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 20%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Futrli held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Cash flow forecasting · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 2% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 11 → 22 of 100

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 35 → 32 of 96

EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Cash flow forecasting	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 35 → 36 of 101
Financial consolidation	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 53 of 102, unchanged
FP&A platforms	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 49 of 74, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Futrli across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	1	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels1

Paraphrase8 labels1

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Highly affordable and integrates seamlessly with accounting packages... Best For: Startups and SMEs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · comparative prompt · alternative

“If you are an accountant serving clients: Futrli is the standard industry tool.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cash flow forecasting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Futrli | Daily data sync + consolidated reporting + forecasting.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial consolidation · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“SMBs needing 3-way forecasting | Business planning + cash flow” Kimi K2 · Cash flow forecasting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Other mentions like Fathom (~$65/mo) or Futrli are solid but pricier for limited budgets.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cash flow forecasting · budget prompt · soft negative

“Futrli may have limitations in treasury management and drilling down to certain KPIs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cash flow forecasting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Futrli, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Futrli was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Fathom22 of 354Not among the top eight

Float21 of 3514Not among the top eight

Cash Flow Frog10 of 351Not among the top eight

Jirav10 of 351Not among the top eight

Anaplan10 of 350Not among the top eight

Cube9 of 352Not among the top eight

Datarails6 of 351Not among the top eight

Planful6 of 351Not among the top eight

Workday Adaptive Planning6 of 351Not among the top eight

Pulse6 of 350Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Futrli. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 35 answers that named Futrli and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

drivetrain.ai26

abacum.ai20

fathomhq.com19

gitnux.org15

guideflow.com15

g2.com14

worldmetrics.org13

quicken.com12

floatapp.com11

tesorio.com11

156 of the 156 domain citations in answers naming Futrli came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

drivetrain.ai/solutions/cash-flow-forecasting-software15

abacum.ai/blog/best-cash-flow-forecasting-software-for-smbs14

fathomhq.com/blog/the-6-best-financial-modelling-software-tools12

guideflow.com/blog/cash-flow-forecasting-software11

quicken.com/blog/top-financial-planning-software-with-cash-flow-analysis-features11

tesorio.com/blog/best-cash-flow-forecasting-software-in-2026-reviewed-and-compared10

drivetrain.ai/solutions/financial-modeling-software9

cubesoftware.com/blog/best-cash-forecasting-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

futrli.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Futrli takes 0% of first choices and Agicap takes 13%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “cash forecasting tools”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “cash flow forecasting software”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 70 a month (“futrli”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 27,842 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 4,277 · 106 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 866
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 36 of 101 in cash flow forecasting

Segment leader

13%

Agicap

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 35 answers
Its own site cited: in 35 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on futrli.com

694

subdomains included

Content

409

counted in the table below

Documentation

201

Product · Integration

7 · 5

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	317	undated		Cash flow forecasting, Accounting software
Case study	40	undated		Accounting software
Glossary or explainer	22	1	2026-09-24
Conference or event	14	undated
Comparison	14	1	2026-09-24
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated
Template or tool	1	1	2026-09-24

Most recent

2026-09-248948084 complete the forecast checklist template or tool
2026-09-249335954 draft vs published forecasts comparison
2026-09-2410102646 convert a forecast to another forecast type glossary or explainer

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page futrli.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Futrli

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Futrli; a claim can dispute any of them.

Futrli (by Sage) 3Futrli by Sage 1

Follow Futrli

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Futrli is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Real-time cash flow forecasting and reporting software
futrli.com
For: businesses and accountants
futrli.com
Price stated: No credit card up front. Upgrade or cancel at any time. No long-term contracts, commitments or hidden fees. Features included in all plans: Unlimited users; Business performance insights; Daily cash flow forecasting; Bespoke reporting & report template library; Budgets and scenario modelling; 3-way forecasting; Free webinars; 24/7 customer support and help centre. Plans shown include Single, Starter, Professional, Practice across multiple currencies. futrli.com
Starting price: £37 futrli.com
Free plan or trial: 14-Day Free Trial futrli.com
Integrations claimed: 4 futrli.com
Certifications: ISO27001 complianceSOC1 compliantSOC2 Type 1 & 2 compliantSOC3 compliantSOC1SOC2 Type 1 & 2SOC3
Hosting: AWS Data Centres
Customers named: More Than BookkeepingMojo BarsBrearley & Co Accountants LtdOokkee Bookeeping and AccountingLa BuvetteCombi Café3xScreen MediaXref

What Futrli's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: futrli.com, futrli.com/pricing, trust.futrli.com, futrli.com/products/hr-forecasts, futrli.com/learn/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Futrli's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Futrli, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Futrli by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Futrli is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Futrli, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.