AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › IBM InfoSphere QualityStage · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

IBM InfoSphere QualityStage

1Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. IBM InfoSphere QualityStage was named 1 time in Account reconciliation, where FloQast led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In account reconciliation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named IBM InfoSphere QualityStage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Account reconciliationAccounting and close0%41 of 820%1under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, IBM InfoSphere QualityStage held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Account reconciliation · by segment

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 32 → 38 of 77

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Account reconciliation0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 32 → 41 of 82

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated IBM InfoSphere QualityStage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Informatica/IBM (enterprise data quality)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as IBM InfoSphere QualityStage, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM InfoSphere QualityStage was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BlackLine1 of 11Not among the top eight
Trintech1 of 11Not among the top eight
Airwallex1 of 10Not among the top eight
Fiserv Recon1 of 10Not among the top eight
FloQast1 of 10Not among the top eight
Hevo Data1 of 10Not among the top eight
HighRadius1 of 10Not among the top eight
Informatica Data Quality1 of 10Not among the top eight
Numeric1 of 10Not among the top eight
Oracle Enterprise Data Quality1 of 10Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IBM InfoSphere QualityStage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named IBM InfoSphere QualityStage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

airwallex.com1
blackline.com1
cfoshortlist.com1
financecopilothq.com1
g2.com1
gitnux.org1
hevodata.com1
kanerika.com1
maxima.ai1
numeric.io1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming IBM InfoSphere QualityStage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ibm.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, IBM InfoSphere QualityStage takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “reconciliation tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “account reconciliation software”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 31,137,701 a month
Searches its site ranks for
562,131 · 83,264 in the top three
Sites linking to it
426,759
Paid Google search
21 searches its ads show for, about 177 clicks and $2,518 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
118+ ads · 118 text · 118 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as International Business Machines Corporation, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 62 in the year, 56 before. 2 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 41 of 82 in account reconciliation
Segment leader
33%
FloQast
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
1 answers
Its own site cited
in 1 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on ibm.com
12,886
subdomains included
Content
2,707
counted in the table below
Documentation
14
Product · Integration
2,160 · 81
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Case study1,34132026-08-26
News or press88242026-09-28
Conference or event19232026-08-25
Glossary or explainer97282026-09-08
Blog6932026-09-23
Podcast or video5092026-09-25
Report or ebook3812026-09-09
Webinar or virtual event1532026-09-11
Template or tool1492026-09-10
Comparison902026-02-19

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on ibm.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ibm.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow IBM InfoSphere QualityStage

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

IBM InfoSphere QualityStage is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Investigate, cleanse and manage data to gain more value from your information assets
For
data quality and information governance initiatives
Price stated
precios de suscripción ibm.com/es-es/products/infosphere-qualitystage
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What IBM InfoSphere QualityStage's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: ibm.com/products/infosphere-qualitystage, ibm.com/es-es/products/infosphere-qualitystage, ibm.com/fr-fr/products/infosphere-qualitystage, ibm.com/it-it/products/infosphere-qualitystage, ibm.com/id-id/products/infosphere-qualitystage. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM InfoSphere QualityStage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM InfoSphere QualityStage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for IBM InfoSphere QualityStage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where IBM InfoSphere QualityStage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name IBM InfoSphere QualityStage, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ibm.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.