Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 72 → 81 of 82
3 categories · RankedTrintech
108Judge labels
3First choices
29Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Account reconciliation for mid-market buyers
Rank 12 of 82 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Trintech →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business88 of 89
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 82
2%12 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise7 of 72
2%31 labels
accepted challenger
In account reconciliation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Trintech for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Account reconciliation | Accounting and close | 2% | 12 of 82 | 25% | 12 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 2% | 7 of 85 | 14% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 88 of 102 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Trintech held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Account reconciliation · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 17 → 12 of 77
Enterprise▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 3 → 9 of 66
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Account reconciliation | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 12 of 82 |
| Financial close manageme | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 7 of 85 |
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 88 of 102 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Trintech across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Trintech across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels1
Paraphrase9 labelsNone
Comparative27 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels1
Scale-constrained19 labels1
Negative25 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative108 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Most mid-market B2B companies find that FloQast or Trintech Adra provide the best balance of features, ease of use, and value for money.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Account reconciliation · direct prompt · first choice
“Mid-Market Leader: Trintech (FloQlosed), Kira Systems. (Often considered more modern UX than BlackLine).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial close manageme · scale prompt · first choice
“Large multi-ERP enterprises needing deep governance → BlackLine or Trintech” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · first choice
“Enterprises prioritize BlackLine/Trintech for depth and controls” Grok 4.1 Fast · Account reconciliation · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Trintech – Enterprise-focused, not suitable for smaller operations.” Mistral Small · Financial close manageme · negative prompt · hard negative
“they can cost anywhere from $10,000 to over $100,000 per year, making them unrealistic for limited budgets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Account reconciliation · budget prompt · soft negative
“Most vendors, including BlackLine, Trintech, and OneStream, use custom quote-based pricing.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · soft negative
“these heavy-duty platforms are notoriously slow, rigid, and expensive to implement” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Account reconciliation · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trintech, over the 108 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trintech was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trintech, over the 108 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trintech was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trintech. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 101 of the 108 answers that named Trintech and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
bluecopa.com66
numeric.io59
guideflow.com46
prophix.com45
highradius.com38
maxima.ai38
g2.com37
learn.g2.com37
worldmetrics.org27
cfoshortlist.com23
416 of the 416 domain citations in answers naming Trintech came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
trintech.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Trintech takes 2% of first choices and FloQast takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
trintech.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Trintech takes 2% of first choices and FloQast takes 33%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “reconciliation tools”
2
Position for “account reconciliation software”
7
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“trintech”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 44 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 30,370 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,316 · 297 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,386
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 82 in account reconciliation
Segment leader
33%
FloQast
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 108 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 101 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on trintech.com
1,896
subdomains included
Content
1,584
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
10 · 62
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 738 | 12 | 2026-09-23 | Account reconciliation, Financial consolidation | |
| News or press | 193 | 2 | 2026-08-11 | Financial close manageme, Accounting software | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 178 | 1 | 2026-09-23 | Account reconciliation, Financial close manageme | |
| Conference or event | 148 | 0 | 2025-12-22 | ||
| Case study | 115 | 2 | 2026-08-11 | Account reconciliation | |
| Podcast or video | 108 | 1 | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Report or ebook | 70 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | Financial close manageme, Account reconciliation | |
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | Cash application | |
| Comparison | 11 | 2 | 2026-08-10 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2026-03-10 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23G2 grid report for enterprise financial reconciliation 2026 blog
- 2026-09-23Webinar governed autonomous finance trintechs ai strategy and the state of ai in the close webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-23Building societies mortgage lending risks blog
- 2026-09-15From best practices to better processes how trintech cadency simplifies intercompany accounting blog
- 2026-09-13The ai financial close sgp sep 17 blog
- 2026-09-08Cash is of the past retail accounting solutions blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 15, 2026Trintech Connect London 2026Shangri-La The Shard, London, United Kingdom · hosts
Last twelve months
- June 14, 2026 to June 16, 20262026 FMS Annual ConferenceNew Orleans · exhibited
- March 18, 2026Trintech User Groups – KrakowWyndham Grand Krakow Old Town, Krakow, Poland · hosted
- November 13, 2025 to November 14, 2025HOSPACE 2025Royal Lancaster Hotel, London · exhibited
As the event pages on trintech.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page trintech.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Trintech
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trintech; a claim can dispute any of them.
Trintech (Adra) 3Trintech (Cadency & Adra) 2Trintech (Adra & Cadency) 1Trintech (Adra / Cadency) 1Trintech (Adra Suite) 1Trintech (Adra, ReconNET) 1Trintech (CCH Tagetik) 1Trintech (Cadency / Adra) 1Trintech (Cadency) 1Trintech (Cadency/Adra) 1Trintech (FloQlosed) 1Trintech / Adra 1
Follow Trintech
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Trintech is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Trintech is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Our cloud-based financial close and account reconciliation software enables F&A professionals to deliver a more streamlined and accurate financial close.
- For
- F&A professionals
- Integrations claimed
- 7 trintech.com
- Customers named
- a leading regional health insurance provider
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, certifications, hosting
What Trintech's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: trintech.com, trintech.com/platform/native-ai. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trintech's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trintech, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trintech by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Trintech is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trintech, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.