AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Irwin · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Irwin

7Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Irwin was named 4 times in Board, where OnBoard led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In board · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Irwin for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Board and investor reportingPlanning and analysis4%9 of 990%4under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26%▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Irwin held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Board · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 79 of 104, unchanged
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 48 → 8 of 95
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 51 → 46 of 95

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Board0%4%▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 48 → 9 of 99

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Irwin across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels2
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Irwin is the top recommendation due to its comprehensive features, ease of use, and focus on investor relations workflows” Mistral Small · Board · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Irwin if you want the best balance of features and pricing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Board · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Irwin (Best CRM-Focused) ... Ideal for: Mid-market companies needing dedicated IR team tools” MiniMax M2.5 · Board · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Need CRM + reporting: Irwin.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Board · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Irwin, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Irwin was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Visible4 of 74Not among the top eight
Carta3 of 71Not among the top eight
Q42 of 71Not among the top eight
DocSend2 of 70Not among the top eight
FactSet2 of 70Not among the top eight
Fundwave2 of 70Not among the top eight
Allvue1 of 70Not among the top eight
Allvue Systems Investor Portal1 of 70Not among the top eight
Altvia1 of 70Not among the top eight
Dynamo1 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Irwin. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Irwin and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gitnux.org7
sourceforge.net7
g2.com6
getirwin.comYour site6
zipdo.co6
lucid.now5
us.fitgap.com5
worldmetrics.org5
wifitalents.com4
allvuesystems.com3

Forty-eight of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Irwin came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on getirwin.com
391
subdomains included
Content
275
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
11 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog157222026-09-29
Report or ebook6022026-07-14
Podcast or video3022026-07-28
Case study1002025-05-06
Conference or event622026-07-29
Webinar or virtual event402025-02-27
Comparison402025-05-06
Glossary or explainer202022-10-14
News or press2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page getirwin.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Irwin

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Irwin is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Investor relations software platform that helps companies discover and connect with investors, monitor shareholder changes, and track interactions with automated features and proactive insights.
For
IR teams; public companies; investment banks; IR consultancies
Customers named
WSP GlobalH&E Equipment ServicesClermont PartnersDoceboSunrunPentairSilverCrest Metals Inc.Tourmaline Oil Corp
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Irwin's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: getirwin.com, trust.getirwin.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Irwin's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Irwin, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Irwin by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Irwin is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Irwin, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at getirwin.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.