| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cap table management | Equity and corporate | 33% | 1 of 42 | 32% | 74 | criticized default | ▼−12Since September 2026: 44% → 32%, −12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 4% | 8 of 99 | 25% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cap table management | 44% | 32% | ▼−12Since September 2026: 44% → 32%, −12 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 1 of 42, unchanged |
| Board | 9% | 4% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 9% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 8 of 99 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Carta: The market leader for VC-backed private companies. Highly trusted by law firms and investors. It offers the most comprehensive suite of services ... but it is generally the most expensive option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cap table management · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend Carta if your priorities are cap table management, fundraising workflow, and a platform that can scale” GPT-5.4 mini · Cap table management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“my default recommendation would be Carta if you want the most established, all-in-one option for cap table + investor reporting” GPT-5.4 mini · Board · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Go with Carta if you need end-to-end (formation to exit), have 50+ stakeholders... dominant for mid-market B2B despite past issues.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cap table management · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Carta — Approach with Caution ... Data misuse for secondary trading: Carta was caught using confidential customer cap table data to solicit secondary share sales” Kimi K2 · Cap table management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Founders have publicly reported steep, unexpected price increases at renewal... canceling required scheduling a mandatory meeting” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cap table management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Carta if budget is your top concern” Kimi K2 · Cap table management · budget prompt · hard negative
“Approach Carta as a mature-company tool; its institutional features come with significant cost, onboarding effort, and privacy considerations.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cap table management · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 225 of the 239 answers that named Carta and are not a share of its labels.
730 of the 791 domain citations in answers naming Carta came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 1,271 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 518 | undated | |||
| Blog | 432 | undated | |||
| Case study | 315 | undated | |||
| News or press | 244 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 111 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 57 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 55 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 6 | undated |
Every page carta.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Carta's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: carta.com, carta.com/plans/fund-management, trust.carta.com, carta.com/solutions/hr, carta.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Carta's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Carta, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Carta by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Carta first in Cap table management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.