Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 56 → 81 of 95
1 category · Named, not rankedQ4
10Judge labels
5First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Q4 was named 2 times in Board, where OnBoard led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market83 of 99
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise3 of 100
9%8 labels
under the label threshold
In board · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Q4 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 83 of 99 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Q4 held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Board · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 11% → 11%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 11% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 95
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 56 → 83 of 99 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Q4 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Q4 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase10 labels5
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“if you mean investor relations for a publicly traded company, I'd look at Q4 instead” GPT-6 Luna · Board · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“aren't ready for enterprise-level solutions like FactSet or Q4” MiniMax M2.5 · Board · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Q4, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Q4 was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Q4, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Q4 was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Q4. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 10 answers that named Q4 and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
q4inc.comYour site6
gitnux.org5
wifitalents.com5
worldmetrics.org5
nasdaq.com4
sourceforge.net4
us.fitgap.com4
g2.com3
getirwin.com3
zipdo.co3
Thirty-six of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Q4 came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
q4inc.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Q4 takes 0% of first choices and OnBoard takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
q4inc.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Q4 takes 0% of first choices and OnBoard takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “board reporting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “board reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 14,800 a month (“q4”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 8,117 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,064 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 275 · 44 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,349
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 8 clicks and $10 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 83 of 99 in board
Segment leader
26%
OnBoard
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on q4inc.com
381
subdomains included
Content
229
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
21 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 128 | 17 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 32 | 4 | 2026-11-13 | ||
| Report or ebook | 24 | 2 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| News or press | 23 | 0 | 2026-06-10 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | 1 | 2026-07-14 | ||
| Case study | 4 | 0 | 2023-09-15 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2026-04-30 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-03-26 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2024-04-24 |
Most recent
- 2026-11-13Q4xnirimarketsdontjustpriceinformaton conference or event
- 2026-09-29Consensus management from manual chore to strategic advantage conference or event
- 2026-09-25Ai just pushed esg out of the top spot in boardroom conversations. heres what ir needs to do about it blog
- 2026-09-22The new path to head of ir how the route to senior investor relations leadership is changing blog
- 2026-08-26Shareholder activism is changing shape what ir teams need to know as proxy advisors lose influence blog
- 2026-08-20Niri dallas swc managing sell side consensus and the power of credibility blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page q4inc.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Q4
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Q4 is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Q4 is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Investor Relations Platform | IR Websites, Events and More
- For
- Investor relations professionals
- Price stated
- Additional 6,000 prompts: $3,000 per year; Additional 10 agents & 250MB storage: $500 per year; Overage penalty: $1,500 for 1,200 prompts if annual limit exceeded q4inc.com/platform-details
- Certifications
- SOC-2
- Customers named
- AMDEA
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Q4's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: q4inc.com, trust.q4inc.com, q4inc.com/platform-details, q4inc.com/case-studies, q4inc.com/company/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Q4's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Q4, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Q4 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Q4 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Q4, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.