Small business▲+1Since September 2026: 23% → 24%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
24%from 23% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 1 → 2 of 104
1 category · RankedVisible
24Judge labels
19First choices
1Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
25% in Board for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 99 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 109
25%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 99
13%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise75 of 100
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In board · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Visible for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 13% | 3 of 99 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 9% → 10%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Visible held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Board · by segment
Mid-market▲+1Since September 2026: 9% → 10%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 95
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 84 → 70 of 95
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 9% | 10% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 9% → 10%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 3 of 99 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Visible across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Visible across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase21 labels18
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 19 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Visible.vc gives you the repeatable portal and pack workflow with the least implementation overhead” Muse Glimmer 30B · Board · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Start with Visible.vc if investor communication and fundraising are active priorities” Kimi K2 · Board · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Visible.vc Best overall fit for mid-sized B2B companies.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Board · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Visible. It's designed for founder-to-investor communication” GPT-6 Luna · Board · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Visible, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Visible was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Visible, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Visible was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Visible. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 24 answers that named Visible and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
gitnux.org15
g2.com13
sourceforge.net13
worldmetrics.org12
zipdo.co11
qubit.capital10
visible.vcYour site10
wifitalents.com9
getirwin.com8
us.fitgap.com8
Ninety-nine of the 109 domain citations in answers naming Visible came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
visible.vc is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Visible takes 13% of first choices and OnBoard takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
visible.vc is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Visible takes 13% of first choices and OnBoard takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “board reporting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “board reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 301,000 a month (“visible”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 68,799 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 13,054 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,206 · 166 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,372
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
13%
rank 3 of 99 in board
Segment leader
26%
OnBoard
- First choices
- 19 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 23 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on visible.vc
1,186
subdomains included
Content
1,032
counted in the table below
Documentation
58
Product · Integration
5 · 16
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 844 | undated | Board | ||
| Template or tool | 74 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 38 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 23 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 22 | undated | |||
| Case study | 16 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page visible.vc exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Visible
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Visible; a claim can dispute any of them.
Visible.vc 5
Follow Visible
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Visible is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Visible is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Platform for Investors and Founders Building Together
- For
- investors and founders
- Price stated
- Pricing visible.vc
- Starting price
- 0 visible.vc/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Get Visible Free visible.vc
- Integrations claimed
- 5 visible.vc/pricing
- Certifications
- AICPA SOC 2SOC 2 Type IIGDPRISO 27001SOC 1/2PCI Level 1
- Customers named
- ExpaEmergence CapitalAntler01AAirtreeBreegaMoxxieFuel Ventures
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Visible's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: visible.vc, visible.vc/pricing, visible.vc/security, visible.vc/product/updates, visible.vc/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Visible's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Visible, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Visible by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Visible is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Visible, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Visible is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Visible is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideVisible is among the products AI models recommend first in Board and investor reporting this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.