Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 57 of 77, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedLeapfin
16Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Leapfin was named 6 times in Revenue recognition, where Maxio led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business59 of 79
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market22 of 77
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise10 of 65
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
In revenue recognition · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Leapfin for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 0% | 22 of 77 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Leapfin held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Revenue recognition · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 23 → 21 of 74
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 3% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 3% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 9 of 62, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 22 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Leapfin across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Leapfin across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Point solutions/subledgers (like RightRev or Leapfin) can sometimes be deployed much faster.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue recognition · scale prompt · alternative
“It is the go-to tool for mobile/web hybrid businesses that process millions of transactions” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue recognition · comparative prompt · alternative
“opting for an external, agile middleware tool (like RightRev or Leapfin) is often safer” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue recognition · negative prompt · alternative
“a standalone solution like RightRev or Leapfin ... may be more practical” Kimi K2 · Revenue recognition · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Leapfin, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leapfin was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Leapfin, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leapfin was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Leapfin. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Leapfin and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
wise.com12
dualentry.com11
ledgerup.ai11
rightrev.com10
pipedrive.com8
eleven.run7
guideflow.com6
hubifi.com6
reddit.com6
zuora.com6
Eighty-three of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Leapfin came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
leapfin.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Leapfin takes 0% of first choices and Maxio takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
leapfin.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Leapfin takes 0% of first choices and Maxio takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “revenue recognition tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “revenue recognition software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“leapfin”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,325 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 701 · 58 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 475
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days
First shown February 2025, as Leap Technologies Inc, verified.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 77 in revenue recognition
Segment leader
20%
Maxio
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on leapfin.com
275
subdomains included
Content
197
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
18 · 8
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 172 | 0 | 2026-06-04 | Revenue recognition, Accounting software | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 14 | 0 | 2025-04-16 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 0 | 2025-10-20 | Revenue recognition | |
| Podcast or video | 4 | 0 | 2025-10-20 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2025-09-18 | Revenue recognition | |
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-06-04Leapfins next chapter joining airwallex blog
- 2026-01-27The last mile of automation luca now validates itself blog
- 2025-12-11Why ai in finance is stalling and why the record to report foundation is the missing link blog
- 2025-12-04Luca now documents itself introducing auto generated audit documentation blog
- 2025-11-18Automation is no longer optional 5 stats that will define finance in 2026 blog
- 2025-11-07The ai rev rec playbook for usage based pricing blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page leapfin.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Leapfin
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Leapfin is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Leapfin is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The AI Infrastructure for Record to Report
- For
- Finance and Accounting teams
- Price stated
- Standard starts at $500 /mo; Premium starts at $1000 /mo; Enterprise custom; base package starts at $1,000 / month (or $12,000 annually) leapfin.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 500 leapfin.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- null leapfin.com/customers
- Integrations claimed
- 10 leapfin.com/pricing
- Customers named
- AirwallexGoodRxStripeNetSuiteApple App StoreSeatgeekEight SleepTop Hat
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Leapfin's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: leapfin.com, leapfin.com/pricing, leapfin.com/solutions/compliance, leapfin.com/solutions/close, leapfin.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Leapfin's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Leapfin, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Leapfin by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Leapfin is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Leapfin, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.