Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
8 categories · RankedMosaic
63Judge labels
5First choices
10Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
8Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in FP&A platforms for small business buyers
Rank 13 of 105 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Mosaic →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market13 of 105
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Mosaic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 2% | 13 of 105 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 2% | 16 of 99 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 0% | 21 of 77 | 17% | 12 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 68 of 74 | 50% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 20% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 27 of 99 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 70 of 101 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Professional services automation | Receivables and billing | 0% | 60 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BigTime at 29% | |
| SaaS metrics and analytics | Planning and analysis | 0% | 37 of 78 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 49% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Mosaic held within the floor in all eight categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial reporting · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 12 → 13 of 102
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial modeling | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 21 of 77 |
| FP&A platforms | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 68 of 74 |
| Board | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 16 of 99 |
| Financial reporting | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 13 of 105 |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 27 of 99 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 46 → 70 of 101 |
| PSA | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 99, unchanged |
| SaaS metrics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 68 → 37 of 78 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Mosaic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Mosaic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels1
Paraphrase16 labels4
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your company has a subscription, recurring revenue, or usage-based model, Mosaic is highly recommended.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Mosaic is a modern FP&A platform built specifically for fast-growing B2B companies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board · direct prompt · first choice
“Mosaic: Built primarily for fast-growing companies, it has highly polished out-of-the-box dashboards and strong integrations.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · scale prompt · alternative
“Need a balance of modeling flexibility, AI forecasting and quick implementation → Drivetrain / Mosaic” Muse Glimmer 30B · Financial modeling · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid discontinued tools: Causal, Pry, and Mosaic have been acquired and shut down” Kimi K2 · Financial modeling · budget prompt · hard negative
“If you're considering Mosaic, factor in its acquisition by HiBob: ask specifically about the product roadmap” GPT-6 Luna · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · soft negative
“stronger planning tools, but usually more expensive than a small company budget allows” GPT-5.4 mini · Financial modeling · budget prompt · soft negative
“Note: Recently acquired by HiBob—evaluate contract terms if considering” Kimi K2 · FP&A platforms · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mosaic, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mosaic was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mosaic, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mosaic was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mosaic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 63 answers that named Mosaic and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
drivetrain.ai34
cubesoftware.com23
learn.g2.com19
clockwork.ai17
datarails.com17
g2.com17
centage.com15
resources.rework.com15
abacum.ai14
getaleph.com14
185 of the 185 domain citations in answers naming Mosaic came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mosaic.tech is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mosaic takes 2% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mosaic.tech is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mosaic takes 2% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 33%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “reporting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 165,000 a month (“mosaic”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 34,052 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 27 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 19 · 0 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,481
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 13 of 105 in financial reporting
Segment leader
33%
Sage Intacct
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 63 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 59 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mosaic.tech
2,255
subdomains included
Content
1,134
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
93 · 228
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 567 | 0 | 2021-05-13 | ||
| Report or ebook | 212 | 0 | 2026-03-02 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 103 | 0 | 2025-03-04 | ||
| News or press | 102 | 0 | 2023-03-13 | ||
| Case study | 72 | 4 | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Comparison | 38 | 1 | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Template or tool | 27 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Podcast or video | 10 | 0 | 2026-03-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2022-07-19 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 1 | 2026-08-30 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-02Hr roi calculator template or tool
- 2026-08-30N8n hibob case study
- 2026-08-30What is a leave of absence glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-25Formula e case study
- 2026-08-25Swapfiets case study
- 2026-08-10N8n hibob case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mosaic.tech exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Mosaic
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mosaic; a claim can dispute any of them.
Mosaic (now HiBob) 1Mosaic Tech 1Mosaic/Abacum 1
Follow Mosaic
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Mosaic is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Mosaic is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Everything you need to complete your security review is here. Browse documents, certifications, and compliance details with confidence.
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers
What Mosaic's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mosaic.tech, trust.mosaic.tech. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mosaic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mosaic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mosaic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Mosaic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mosaic, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.