1 category · Named, not rankedNameScan
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AML and transaction monitoring | Tax and compliance | 2% | 12 of 108 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated NameScan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“1. NameScan - Offers an integrated all-in-one platform” MiniMax M2.5 · AML monitoring · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“NameScan is tailored to startups, SMEs, and businesses seeking low-cost tools that still deliver compliance” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AML monitoring · budget prompt · alternative
“Only need sanctions/PEP checks, not full TX monitoring | Sanction Scanner, NameScan, or Trulioo” Kimi K2 · AML monitoring · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as NameScan, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NameScan was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named NameScan and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Forty of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming NameScan came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 184 | 23 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Report or ebook | 6 | 0 | 2018-04-20 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 1 | 2026-09-12 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2024-09-25 | ||
| Case study | 1 | 0 | 2019-08-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Aml screening software for accountants blog
- 2026-09-15Insights cost of false positives aml blog
- 2026-09-15Sanctions screening 101 ofac un eu and dfat lists explained blog
- 2026-09-12Insights kyc vs kyb comparison
- 2026-09-10Document verification services country comparison blog
- 2026-09-09Global identity verification challenges strategies blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page namescan.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow NameScan
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
NameScan is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AML/CTF compliance screening platform
- For
- compliance teams and the developers who support them
- Price stated
- From $2.00 USD per scan namescan.io
- Starting price
- 2.00 namescan.io
- Free plan or trial
- Run 10 free searches every month, no card required namescan.io
- Certifications
- ISO 27001ISO 27701
- Customers named
- UPayCard
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What NameScan's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: namescan.io, namescan.io/pricing, namescan.io/insights/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NameScan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NameScan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for NameScan by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where NameScan is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name NameScan, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.