Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 49 of 95, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedNasdaq IR Insight
8Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Nasdaq IR Insight was named 1 time in Board, where OnBoard led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market51 of 99
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise8 of 100
4%6 labels
under the label threshold
In board · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Nasdaq IR Insight for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 51 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Nasdaq IR Insight held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Board · by segment
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 21 → 10 of 95
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Board | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 51 of 99, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Nasdaq IR Insight across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Nasdaq IR Insight across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels2
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“stronger if you need a more traditional investor relations platform” Perplexity Sonar · Board · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Nasdaq IR Insight, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nasdaq IR Insight was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Nasdaq IR Insight, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nasdaq IR Insight was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nasdaq IR Insight. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named Nasdaq IR Insight and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
getirwin.com4
gitnux.org4
nasdaq.comYour site4
q4inc.com4
sourceforge.net4
wifitalents.com4
ellty.com3
g2.com3
qubit.capital3
worldmetrics.org3
Thirty-two of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming Nasdaq IR Insight came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
nasdaq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Nasdaq IR Insight takes 0% of first choices and OnBoard takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
nasdaq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Nasdaq IR Insight takes 0% of first choices and OnBoard takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “board reporting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “board reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 21,233,250 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 412,440 · 45,198 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 133,879
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 13 clicks and $57 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 51 of 99 in board
Segment leader
26%
OnBoard
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 8 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on nasdaq.com
27
subdomains included
Content
11
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
5 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 11 | 6 | 2026-09-28 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Bigwire report or ebook
- 2026-09-28Powershares etf report report or ebook
- 2026-09-24Franklin libertyshares etf report report or ebook
- 2026-09-24Ishares weekly equity models report report or ebook
- 2026-09-23First trust report report or ebook
- 2026-09-08Kraneshares etf report report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page nasdaq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Nasdaq IR Insight
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Nasdaq IR Insight is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Nasdaq IR Insight is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Purpose built IR software to streamline complex workflows, access premium content, engage shareholders, and measure your ROI.
- For
- IR teams and CFOs
- Free plan or trial
- Take a Free Self-Guided Tour nasdaq.com/products/ir-intelligence/ir-insight
- Customers named
- Standard CharteredRai WayNAPCO Security Technology
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Nasdaq IR Insight's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: nasdaq.com/products/ir-intelligence/ir-insight, nasdaq.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nasdaq IR Insight's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nasdaq IR Insight, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nasdaq IR Insight by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Nasdaq IR Insight is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Nasdaq IR Insight, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.