Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
NetSuite · 2 categories · Named, not rankedNetSuite Planning and Budgeting
7Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. NetSuite Planning and Budgeting was named 4 times in Corporate performance ma and 1 other category, where Planful led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business60 of 116
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market24 of 99
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named NetSuite Planning and Budgeting for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 24 of 99 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 65 of 74 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 20% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, NetSuite Planning and Budgeting held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate performance ma · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 78 → 42 of 91
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 78 → 24 of 99 |
| FP&A platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 45 → 65 of 74 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated NetSuite Planning and Budgeting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated NetSuite Planning and Budgeting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Warning: While great for NetSuite shops, this tool lacks the portability to move to a different ERP later” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate performance ma · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“if you already run NetSuite ERP; keeping planning close to the financial system may make the most sense” GPT-6 Luna · Corporate performance ma · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Worth evaluating if you already run NetSuite” GPT-6 Luna · Corporate performance ma · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Oracle NetSuite Budgeting & Planning is listed at Time to ROI 21 months, Time to implement 6 months” Muse Glimmer 30B · FP&A platforms · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NetSuite Planning and Budgeting was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NetSuite Planning and Budgeting was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named NetSuite Planning and Budgeting. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 7 answers that named NetSuite Planning and Budgeting and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cubesoftware.com3
drivetrain.ai3
netsuite.comYour site3
workday.com3
cfoshortlist.com2
datarails.com2
g2.com2
getaleph.com2
jirav.com2
pigment.com2
Twenty-one of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming NetSuite Planning and Budgeting came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as NetSuite Planning and Budgeting
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as NetSuite Planning and Budgeting; a claim can dispute any of them.
NetSuite EPM (formerly Planful) 1Oracle NetSuite Budgeting & Planning 1
Follow NetSuite Planning and Budgeting
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
NetSuite is the company behind NetSuite Planning and Budgeting.ShowHide
The company
NetSuite is the company behind NetSuite Planning and Budgeting.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from NetSuite
- NetSuite AP, NetSuite AP Automation, NetSuite AR, NetSuite Advanced Revenue Management, NetSuite ERP, NetSuite Fixed Assets, NetSuite Fixed Assets Management, NetSuite Lease Accounting and 5 more
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automate labor-intensive planning and budgeting processes so finance teams can quickly and easily produce budgets and forecasts, model what-if scenarios, and generate reports—all within one collaborative, scalable solution.
- For
- finance teams
- Price stated
- NetSuite Enterprise Performance Management is available as an add-on module. netsuite.com/portal/products/erp/epm.shtml
- Free plan or trial
- Free Product Tour netsuite.com/portal/products/erp/epm.shtml
- Customers named
- Synagro strengthens financial forecasting with NetSuite EPMBackstop Solutions GroupMongoDBPennside PartnersW. Capra Consulting Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What NetSuite Planning and Budgeting's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: netsuite.com/portal/products/erp/epm.shtml, netsuite.com/portal/products/professional-services-automation/project-budgeting.shtml, netsuite.com/portal/company/newsroom/survey-cfos-walking-the-tightrope-between-short-term-budget-cuts-and-long-term-efficiency.shtml, netsuite.com/portal/company/newsroom/netsuite-project-360-empowers-project-managers-to-deliver-projects-on-time-and-within-budget.shtml, netsuite.com/portal/company/newsroom/netsuite-introduces-new-enterprise-performance-management-ai-capabilities-to-help-finance-teams-accelerate-processes.shtml. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NetSuite Planning and Budgeting's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for NetSuite Planning and Budgeting by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where NetSuite Planning and Budgeting is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.