Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 16 → 19 of 59
1 category · RankedOccupier
21Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Lease accounting for mid-market buyers
Rank 21 of 71 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Occupier →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business21 of 67
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market21 of 71
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise11 of 70
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Occupier for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 21 of 71 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Occupier held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Lease accounting · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 16 → 19 of 64
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 18 → 9 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lease accounting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 21 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Occupier across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Occupier across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative10 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best Modern Architecture... Emerging contender focused on growth-stage and mid-market companies” Kimi K2 · Lease accounting · direct prompt · alternative
“Ideal when regulatory scrutiny or internal controls require strict document-to-data linkage” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Visual Lease and Occupier win for hybrid real-estate/accounting workflows” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Occupier if you manage a changing, multi-location tenant portfolio” GPT-6 Luna · Lease accounting · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“G2 reviews mention reporting limitations and occasional inaccurate extracted information” GPT-6 Luna · Lease accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Occupier, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Occupier was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Occupier, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Occupier was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Occupier. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Occupier and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com15
occupier.comYour site15
finquery.com14
debtbook.com13
softwareconnect.com12
capterra.co.uk8
capterra.com8
finantrix.com8
guideflow.com7
netgain.tech7
Ninety-two of the 107 domain citations in answers naming Occupier came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
occupier.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Occupier takes 0% of first choices and FinQuery takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
occupier.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Occupier takes 0% of first choices and FinQuery takes 29%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lease accounting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “lease accounting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“occupier”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 8,591 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 5,226 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,002 · 38 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 957
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 21 of 71 in lease accounting
Segment leader
29%
FinQuery
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 21 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on occupier.com
396
subdomains included
Content
315
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
5 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 255 | 6 | 2026-07-21 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| Case study | 24 | 0 | 2025-08-14 | Lease accounting | |
| Comparison | 16 | 2 | 2026-07-21 | Lease accounting, Accounting software | |
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 1 | 2026-07-21 | ||
| Template or tool | 8 | 0 | 2026-04-03 | Lease accounting | |
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-07-21Cam charges a guide to common area maintenance blog
- 2026-07-21Commercial rent structure blog
- 2026-07-21Guide to rou assets calculate blog
- 2026-07-21Lease impairments blog
- 2026-07-21Lessee vs lessor comparison
- 2026-07-21Lessee vs lessor accounting comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page occupier.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Occupier
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Occupier is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Occupier is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Lease management software built for both teams.
- For
- commercial tenants
- Price stated
- Request Pricing occupier.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free Tour occupier.com
- Certifications
- ASC 842IFRS 16FRS 102GASB 87
- Customers named
- solidcoreSeismicYoshinoyaFresh Dining ConceptsLeap
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What Occupier's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: occupier.com, occupier.com/pricing, occupier.com/product/deal-management. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Occupier's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Occupier, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Occupier by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Occupier is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Occupier, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.