Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 110 → 107 of 116
1 category · Named, not rankedOpenlink
1Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
1 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Openlink was named 1 time in Treasury management syst, where Trovata led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market114 of 124
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Openlink for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 114 of 124 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Openlink held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Treasury management syst · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 110 → 114 of 124 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Openlink across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Openlink across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“When evaluating any ION product, ask hard questions about their cloud infrastructure isolation and business continuity plans.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Openlink, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Openlink was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Openlink, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Openlink was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Openlink. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Openlink and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
darkreading.com1
embat.io1
en.wikipedia.org1
finantrix.com1
gartner.com1
iongroup.comYour site1
jackhenry.com1
jpmorgan.com1
kyriba.com1
nasdaq.com1
Nine of the ten domain citations in answers naming Openlink came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
iongroup.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Openlink takes 0% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
iongroup.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Openlink takes 0% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “treasury management system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “treasury management systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 11,394 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,997 · 244 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,746
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 4 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 114 of 124 in treasury management syst
Segment leader
28%
Trovata
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 1 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 1 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on iongroup.com
1,541
subdomains included
Content
812
counted in the table below
Documentation
43
Product · Integration
84 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 471 | 1 | 2026-09-03 | Treasury management syst, Cash flow forecasting | |
| News or press | 298 | 1 | 2026-09-09 | Treasury management syst | |
| Conference or event | 15 | 3 | 2026-11-08 | ||
| Case study | 9 | 0 | 2020-08-18 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2025-10-23 | Treasury management syst | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2025-11-14 | Treasury management syst | |
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2025-09-10 | Treasury management syst | |
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2025-07-02 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2026-01-09 |
Most recent
- 2026-11-08Afp 2026 conference or event
- 2026-11-02Fia expo 2026 conference or event
- 2026-10-14Sta national annual conference 2026 conference or event
- 2026-09-09Ion partners with coinbase to support kalshis event contracts news or press
- 2026-09-03Keeping pace with the next phase of north american gas operations blog
- 2026-06-25Ficc cil eliminating money funds cleared margin and clearing broker balance sheet blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 14, 2026STA National Annual ConferenceJW Marriott Washington, DC, Washington, USA · attends
- November 2, 2026FIA ExpoSheraton Grand Chicago Riverwalk, Chicago, USA · attends
- November 8, 2026AFPLas Vegas, USA · exhibits
As the event pages on iongroup.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page iongroup.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Openlink
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Openlink's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Openlink, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Openlink by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Openlink is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Openlink, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.