Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 42 → 33 of 109
2 categories · Named, not rankedEmbat
11Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Embat was named 7 times in Treasury management syst and 1 other category, where Trovata led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business33 of 117
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market32 of 124
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Embat for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 32 of 124 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 63 of 101 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 13% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Embat held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Treasury management syst · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 41 → 27 of 116
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 41 → 32 of 124 |
| Cash flow forecasting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 63 of 101, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Embat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Embat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“look toward simpler, lighter-weight, or API-first modern tools (e.g., *TreasuryView*, *Embat*, or bank-integrated cash visibility portals)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · alternative
“Atlar or Embat (G2 mentions for emerging/affordable TMS)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · alternative
“Modern, cloud-native, faster implementation; good for mid-market” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Treasury management syst · scale prompt · alternative
“2. Embat - *Best for Multi-Entity & Multi-Currency*” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Embat, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Embat was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Embat, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Embat was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Embat. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Embat and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
embat.ioYour site8
debtbook.com5
agicap.com4
centime.com4
eco.com4
g2.com4
treasury.ripple.com4
eftsure.com3
gartner.com3
kyriba.com3
Thirty-four of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Embat came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on embat.io
930
subdomains included
Content
220
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 135 | 27 | 2026-09-24 | Treasury management syst, Cash flow forecasting | |
| Case study | 48 | 2 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | 3 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | Treasury management syst | |
| Report or ebook | 8 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Comparison | 8 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 1 | 2026-08-11 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28How sequra turned its treasury into a continuous liquidity engine with embat case study
- 2026-09-24Discounted cash flow blog
- 2026-09-23B2b payments platform blog
- 2026-09-22Bacs vs chaps vs faster payments comparison
- 2026-09-17Retail cash flow management blog
- 2026-09-16Credit transfer instant payment rtgs blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page embat.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Embat
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Embat; a claim can dispute any of them.
Agicap/Embat 1
Follow Embat
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Embat is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Embat is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Treasury Management System for Real-Time Control
- For
- Corporate Treasury
- Integrations claimed
- 15000 embat.io
- Certifications
- ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IIGeneral Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)EU AI Act
- Customers named
- FeverCPS GroupGrupo ConstrucíaParlemwallapopPRODESAR2 HotelsthePower
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Embat's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: embat.io, embat.io/pricing, embat.io/security, embat.io/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Embat's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Embat, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Embat by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Embat is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Embat, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.