| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 0% | 71 of 73 | 75% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Oracle NetSuite at 39% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 72 of 83 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 118 of 136 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 0% | 65 of 77 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 43 → 71 of 73 |
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 72 of 83, unchanged |
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 118 of 136, unchanged |
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 65 of 77, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Taking on a new ECC / R/3 / EBS / PeopleSoft / JD Edwards deployment today would lock you into a platform the vendor is actively steering customers off of.” Muse Glimmer 30B · ERP systems · negative prompt · hard negative
“Legacy systems (e.g., SAP ECC, older Oracle EBS).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ERP systems · negative prompt · hard negative
“Oracle investigated critical vulnerabilities in its E-Business Suite... ensure you have applied all recent security patches.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution with: SAP ECC (non-Hana), Oracle E-Business Suite, Microsoft Dynamics GP.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Revenue recognition · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 14 answers that named Oracle E-Business Suite and are not a share of its labels.
Twenty-nine of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Oracle E-Business Suite came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Oracle E-Business Suite's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: oracle.com/applications/ebusiness, oracle.com/applications/apps-benchmarks/e-business-suite, learn.oracle.com/ols/home/oracle-e-business-suite-learning-subscription/50662, learn.oracle.com/ols/home/r122-installpatchmaintain-oracle-e-business-suite-ed-1/63038, learn.oracle.com/ols/course/e-business-suite-r12/50662/56913. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle E-Business Suite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle E-Business Suite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle E-Business Suite by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: