Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 47 → 49 of 51
Microsoft Dynamics · 2 categories · RankedMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations
45Judge labels
5First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in ERP systems for enterprise buyers
Rank 16 of 73 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business54 of 56
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market16 of 73
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise3 of 47
10%34 labels
accepted challenger
In erp systems · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 0% | 16 of 73 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Oracle NetSuite at 39% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 58 of 102 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · ERP systems · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 15 → 18 of 63
Enterprise▼−3Since September 2026: 14% → 11%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 14% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 3 of 41, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 16 of 73 |
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 58 of 102, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase14 labels1
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels3
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations or OneStream are strong alternatives.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Financial consolidation · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Flexible, user-friendly, and good pricing for mid-market.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ERP systems · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“useful if you are already in the Microsoft ecosystem” Muse Glimmer 30B · ERP systems · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best if you're already in the Microsoft ecosystem.” MiniMax M2.5 · ERP systems · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 45 answers that named Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
erpresearch.com30
erp-pilot.com13
houseblend.io11
randgroup.com11
techrepublic.com10
netsuite.com9
elevatiq.com8
learn.g2.com8
linkedin.com8
sap.com8
116 of the 116 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
microsoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations takes 0% of first choices and Oracle NetSuite takes 39%.ShowHide
Search and answers
microsoft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations takes 0% of first choices and Oracle NetSuite takes 39%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “erp system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “erp systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“microsoft dynamics 365 finance & operations”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 19 a month
- Its company's site
- microsoft.com shared with Microsoft Dynamics's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 145,358,109 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,421,769 · 793,520 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,904,433
- Paid Google search
- 56 searches its ads show for, about 705 clicks and $12,455 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 73 in ERP systems
Segment leader
39%
Oracle NetSuite
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 45 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 41 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations; a claim can dispute any of them.
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations (D365 F&O) 1Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Supply Chain Management (SCM) 1
Follow Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Microsoft Dynamics is the company behind Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations.ShowHide
The company
Microsoft Dynamics is the company behind Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Maximalizujte finanční transparentnost a ziskovost.
- Free plan or trial
- Vyzkoušet zdarma microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/pricing-overview
- Customers named
- ContentsquareServiceNowPangaea DataNeo4jSoftwareOnePresidio
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/pricing-overview, trust.microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/solutions/ai, microsoft.com/cs-cz/isv/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.