AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Oracle Analytics · October 2026 Edition
Oracle · 1 category · Ranked

Oracle Analytics

18Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Financial reporting for enterprise buyers
Rank 41 of 105 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Financial reporting and dashboardsPlanning and analysis0%41 of 1050%2under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Oracle Analytics held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Financial reporting · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 86 → 99 of 103
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 39 of 102, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 42 → 21 of 101

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Financial reporting0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 41 of 105, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Oracle Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enterprise-grade with robust governance.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Analytics, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Analytics was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Power BI17 of 1810Not among the top eight
Tableau16 of 181Not among the top eight
Qlik Sense12 of 180Not among the top eight
Looker11 of 180Not among the top eight
SAP Analytics Cloud10 of 181Not among the top eight
IBM Cognos Analytics10 of 180Not among the top eight
Looker Studio4 of 180Not among the top eight
Metabase4 of 180Not among the top eight
Zoho Analytics4 of 180Not among the top eight
Anaplan3 of 180Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 18 answers that named Oracle Analytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org9
kanerika.com8
gitnux.org7
qlik.com6
integrate.io4
medium.com4
querio.ai4
softwaresuggest.com4
zoho.com4
blogs.biva.ai3

Fifty-three of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming Oracle Analytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Oracle Analytics stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
390 a month (“oracle analytics”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
76 a month
Its own site
It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 41 of 105 in financial reporting
Segment leader
33%
Sage Intacct
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
18 answers
Its own site cited
in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Oracle Analytics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Analytics; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle Analytics Cloud 1

Follow Oracle Analytics

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Oracle is the company behind Oracle Analytics.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
a guide to help you on your journey to gain deeper insights with Oracle Analytics Cloud and/or Oracle Analytics Server
For
Oracle Business Intelligence Applications customers
Price stated
By moving to Oracle Analytics Cloud, you can Bring Your Own License to offset much of the cost. As an OBIEE customer, there is no additional cost when you move to Oracle Analytics Server. oracle.com/analytics/obia
Free plan or trial
Get a free trial of Oracle Analytics Cloud. oracle.com/analytics/obia
Certifications
Oracle Certified Partner
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers

What Oracle Analytics's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: oracle.com/analytics/obia, oracle.com/analytics/demos, oracle.com/analytics/obiee, oracle.com/analytics/mobile, oracle.com/analytics/videos. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Analytics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Oracle Analytics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Analytics, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.