Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 36 → 26 of 51
Microsoft Dynamics 365
99Judge labels
4First choices
25Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
8Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in ERP systems for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 73 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Microsoft Dynamics 365 →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business21 of 56
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market6 of 73
2%22 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 47
2%29 labels
accepted challenger
In erp systems · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Microsoft Dynamics 365 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERP systems | Accounting and close | 2% | 6 of 73 | 14% | 22 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounting software | Accounting and close | 2% | 7 of 55 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 44% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Fixed asset accounting | Accounting and close | 0% | 104 of 107 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Rebate management | Receivables and billing | 0% | 76 of 80 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Enable at 52% | |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 92 of 111 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI accounting assistants | Accounting and close | 0% | 69 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 52 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 0% | 62 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Microsoft Dynamics 365 held within the floor in all eight categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · ERP systems · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 8 → 6 of 63
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 5 of 41, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 52 of 105 |
| ERP systems | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 6 of 73 |
| Accounting software | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 of 55, unchanged |
| Fixed asset accounting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 39 → 104 of 107 |
| Rebate management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 76 of 80, unchanged |
| Supplier management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 72 → 92 of 111 |
| AI accounting assistants | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 69 of 85, unchanged |
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 124, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Microsoft Dynamics 365 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Microsoft Dynamics 365 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels1
Paraphrase9 labelsNone
Comparative25 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained14 labels2
Scale-constrained14 labels1
Negative22 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative99 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“NetSuite, Sage Intacct, and Dynamics 365 are strong starting points” Kimi K2 · Accounting software · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd begin with NetSuite and Microsoft Dynamics 365” GPT-5.4 mini · ERP systems · direct prompt · first choice
“If you're already on the Microsoft stack, Dynamics 365 Business Central is worth a serious look.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial reporting · scale prompt · alternative
“Strong Microsoft ecosystem integration... Cons: Can feel complex for pure ERP. Gartner Leader” Grok 4.1 Fast · ERP systems · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“described as basic setups that may lack the depth and specialized features needed for robust fixed asset management” Mistral Small · Fixed asset accounting · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if budget < $1K: Enterprise options like NetSuite/Dynamics 365 (~$25K+/year)” Grok 4.1 Fast · ERP systems · budget prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise ERPs (Oracle NetSuite / Microsoft Dynamics) for Small Business ... be cautious of buying a Ferrari to drive to the grocery store” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Accounting software · negative prompt · soft negative
“Odoo, Microsoft Dynamics 365, and other broad business platforms when rebate management is only one part of a larger workflow” Perplexity Sonar · Rebate management · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Dynamics 365, over the 99 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Dynamics 365 was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Dynamics 365, over the 99 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Dynamics 365 was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Dynamics 365. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 82 of the 99 answers that named Microsoft Dynamics 365 and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
erpresearch.com46
netsuite.com21
erp-pilot.com16
learn.g2.com15
techrepublic.com15
g2.com14
linkedin.com14
zapier.com14
erp-software.org13
ramp.com13
No domain is on file for Microsoft Dynamics 365, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Microsoft Dynamics 365 stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Microsoft Dynamics 365 stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 12,100 a month (“microsoft dynamics 365”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 604 a month
- Its own site
- No site of its own on file, so no site figures
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 6 of 73 in ERP systems
Segment leader
39%
Oracle NetSuite
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 99 answers
- Its own site cited
- No site on file to match
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Microsoft Dynamics 365
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft Dynamics 365; a claim can dispute any of them.
Microsoft Dynamics 7Dynamics 365 6Dynamics 3Microsoft Dynamics 365 (Business Central or Finance & Operations) 1Microsoft Dynamics 365 (F&O or Business Central) 1Microsoft Dynamics 365 (Finance & Operations) 1
Follow Microsoft Dynamics 365
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Microsoft Dynamics is the company behind Microsoft Dynamics 365.ShowHide
The company
Microsoft Dynamics is the company behind Microsoft Dynamics 365.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIs this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Dynamics 365's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Dynamics 365, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Dynamics 365 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Microsoft Dynamics 365 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Dynamics 365, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.