Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 88 → 11 of 97
Oracle · 1 category · RankedOracle Tax Reporting
36Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Corporate tax provision for mid-market buyers
Rank 21 of 102 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Oracle Tax Reporting →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business12 of 108
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market21 of 102
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise18 of 95
0%19 labels
accepted challenger
In corporate tax provision · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Oracle Tax Reporting for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate tax provision | Tax and compliance | 0% | 21 of 102 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Oracle Tax Reporting held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate tax provision · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 23 → 21 of 94
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 14 → 17 of 88
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate tax provision | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 21 of 102 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Oracle Tax Reporting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Oracle Tax Reporting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels1
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best For: Highly centralized global finance departments already utilizing the Oracle ERP or Oracle Cloud EPM suite.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate tax provision · comparative prompt · alternative
“If your company already uses Oracle systems, Oracle Tax Reporting Cloud is a strong alternative.” Mistral Small · Corporate tax provision · direct prompt · alternative
“If you're already using Oracle systems, Oracle Tax Reporting would integrate most seamlessly.” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate tax provision · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“explicitly says to avoid or be cautious about Longview, ONESOURCE, Workiva, Oracle Tax Reporting, and Corptax” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate tax provision · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Tax Reporting, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Tax Reporting was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Oracle Tax Reporting, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Tax Reporting was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Tax Reporting. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 36 answers that named Oracle Tax Reporting and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
tax.thomsonreuters.com21
zipdo.co21
worldmetrics.org20
gitnux.org19
thecfoclub.com16
wifitalents.com13
pro.bloombergtax.com12
theaccountingclub.net11
finance-ai-index.com10
cscglobal.com9
152 of the 152 domain citations in answers naming Oracle Tax Reporting came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Oracle Tax Reporting stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Oracle Tax Reporting stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“oracle tax reporting”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 21 of 102 in corporate tax provision
Segment leader
21%
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 36 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 33 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Oracle Tax Reporting
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Tax Reporting; a claim can dispute any of them.
Oracle Tax Reporting Cloud 2Oracle Cloud EPM Tax Reporting 1Oracle Cloud EPM Tax Reporting (TRCS / Hyperion Tax Provision) 1Oracle EPM Tax Provision 1Oracle Tax Reporting Cloud Service (TRCS) 1
Follow Oracle Tax Reporting
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Tax Reporting.ShowHide
The company
Oracle is the company behind Oracle Tax Reporting.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Streamline your tax reporting processes. Align tax with corporate financial reporting for better visibility and compliance.
- For
- corporate tax group
- Customers named
- Aspen MedicalRutgers
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Oracle Tax Reporting's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com/performance-management/tax-reporting, oracle.com/performance-management/narrative-reporting, oracle.com/apac/performance-management/tax-reporting, oracle.com/asean/performance-management/tax-reporting, oracle.com/latam/performance-management/tax-reporting. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Tax Reporting's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Tax Reporting, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Tax Reporting by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Oracle Tax Reporting is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Tax Reporting, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.