Every category where a model named Oracle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
ERP systems	Accounting and close	0%	51 of 73	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by Oracle NetSuite at 39%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Corporate tax provision	Tax and compliance	0%	102 of 102	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 21%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Financial consolidation	Accounting and close	0%	99 of 102	67%	3	under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Transfer pricing	Tax and compliance	0%	100 of 101	67%	3	under 10 labels · led by TPGenie at 30%
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	99 of 105	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	61 of 74	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 20%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	0%	73 of 77	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
SEC and disclosure reporting	Accounting and close	0%	20 of 63	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Workiva at 32%
Accounting software	Accounting and close	0%	34 of 55	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 44%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Entity management	Equity and corporate	0%	71 of 81	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
ESG and carbon reporting	Equity and corporate	0%	62 of 110	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Greenly at 36%
Financial close management	Accounting and close	0%	76 of 85	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55%	goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
Fixed asset accounting	Accounting and close	0%	50 of 107	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 34%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Global e-invoicing compliance	Tax and compliance	0%	102 of 136	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Professional services automation	Receivables and billing	0%	86 of 99	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by BigTime at 29%
Spend management platforms	Spend and procurement	0%	40 of 46	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 44%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Oracle held within the floor in all sixteen categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · ERP systems · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 46 → 48 of 51

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 55 → 48 of 63

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 11 → 28 of 41

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
ERP systems	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 55 → 51 of 73
Corporate tax provision	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 102 of 102, unchanged
Financial consolidation	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 99 of 102, unchanged
Transfer pricing	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 100 of 101, unchanged
Financial reporting	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 107 → 99 of 105
FP&A platforms	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 47 → 61 of 74
Revenue recognition	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 73 of 77, unchanged
Disclosure reporting	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 20 of 63, unchanged
Accounting software	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 34 of 55, unchanged
Entity management	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 71 of 81, unchanged
ESG and carbon reporting	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 62 of 110, unchanged
Financial close manageme	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 53 → 76 of 85
Fixed asset accounting	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 73 → 50 of 107
Global e-invoicing compl	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 102 of 136, unchanged
PSA	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 86 of 99, unchanged
Spend management platfor	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 40 of 46, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Oracle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	7	9
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	6	7
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	3	0	3
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels1

Paraphrase8 labelsNone

Comparative17 labelsNone

Budget-constrained13 labelsNone

Scale-constrained20 labelsNone

Negative34 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative105 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Oracle solutions are often chosen for enterprise finance architecture more than for best-in-class SEC disclosure collaboration.” GPT-5.4 mini · Disclosure reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Oracle and SAP both describe fixed asset/accounting functionality as part of their accounting/financial systems” GPT-5.4 mini · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Shortlist them if your organization already runs key workflows on Salesforce or Oracle.” GPT-6 Luna · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Long implementations (22 months avg. vs. SAP's 4), ballooning costs ... Avoid if: Mid-market or cost-sensitive” Grok 4.1 Fast · ERP systems · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid the "Enterprise Giant" tools (like Oracle) unless necessary; they require heavy training.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Entity management · direct prompt · hard negative

“Avoid assuming your ERP\u2019s built-in tax tool can calculate your income tax provision.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate tax provision · negative prompt · hard negative

“Heavy enterprise tools like SAP TP or Oracle (overkill/costly)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Transfer pricing · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle, over the 105 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Oracle NetSuite31 of 1053Not among the top eight

SAP29 of 1052Not among the top eight

SAP S/4HANA19 of 1050Not among the top eight

SAP Asset Accounting15 of 1050Not among the top eight

Xero12 of 1052Not among the top eight

OneStream12 of 1051Not among the top eight

Workiva10 of 1053Not among the top eight

Sage Intacct10 of 1052Not among the top eight

Vena10 of 1051Not among the top eight

HighRadius9 of 1053Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 86 of the 105 answers that named Oracle and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com28

worldmetrics.org23

gitnux.org18

guideflow.com16

erpresearch.com14

highradius.com14

linkedin.com13

sourceforge.net12

prophix.com11

sage.com11

160 of the 160 domain citations in answers naming Oracle came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/transfer-pricing6

mrisoftware.com/uk/blog/fixed-asset-management-software-questions6

fathomhq.com/blog/the-6-best-financial-consolidation-software-solutions-in-20245

getsphere.com/blog/best-transfer-pricing-software-for-compliance5

guideflow.com/blog/fixed-asset-management-software5

houseblend.io/articles/fixed-asset-management-software-comparison5

itechguides.com/best/transfer-pricing-software5

maxima.ai/articles/financial-consolidation-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

oracle.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Oracle takes 0% of first choices and Oracle NetSuite takes 39%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “erp system”

Position for “erp systems”

Searches for its name, Google: 450,000 a month (“oracle”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 66,611 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 7,410,638 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 280,257 · 54,144 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 265,940
Paid Google search: 9 searches its ads show for, about 43 clicks and $247 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

101+ ads · 101 text · 101 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2023, as Oracle America, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 37 in the year, 64 before. 19 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 51 of 73 in ERP systems

Segment leader

39%

Oracle NetSuite

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 105 answers
Its own site cited: in 86 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on oracle.com

10,005

subdomains included

Content

481

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

2 · 1

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days
Glossary or explainer	220	undated
Conference or event	171	undated
Case study	37	undated
Template or tool	14	undated
Webinar or virtual event	13	undated
Report or ebook	13	undated
Blog	11	undated
Comparison	2	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page oracle.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Oracle

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle; a claim can dispute any of them.

NetSuite / Oracle 1Oracle (Fusion Cloud ERP, EBS, NetSuite, JD Edwards) 1SAP/Oracle 1

Follow Oracle

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Oracle is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Oracle Trust Center: Our mission is securing your data
oracle.com/trust
For: organizations
oracle.com/trust
Price stated: Save $500 per person with special group pricing. oracle.com/ai-world/partners
Free plan or trial: Try Oracle Cloud Free Tier oracle.com/corporate/features/connect-analyze-integrate.html
Certifications: Common Criteria evaluation
Customers named: Liberty EnergyKobalt MusicNHS Shared Business ServicesWorldlineRappiAVConduentRenesas
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, hosting

What Oracle's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: oracle.com, oracle.com/trust, oracle.com/corporate/features/connect-analyze-integrate.html, oracle.com/customers, oracle.com/ai-world/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Oracle is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.