Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 73 → 96 of 101
12 categories · RankedSAP
108Judge labels
2First choices
64Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
12Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Corporate performance ma for mid-market buyers
Rank 95 of 99 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 57% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business111 of 116
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market95 of 99
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise33 of 73
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 95 of 99 | 57% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Rebate management | Receivables and billing | 0% | 80 of 80 | 100% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Enable at 52% | |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 89 of 102 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 85 of 85 | 100% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Invoicing software | Receivables and billing | 0% | 23 of 71 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 26 of 87 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Corporate tax provision | Tax and compliance | 0% | 101 of 102 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 63 of 74 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SEC and disclosure reporting | Accounting and close | 0% | 21 of 63 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Workiva at 32% | |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 92 of 105 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Internal controls and SOX | Tax and compliance | 0% | 55 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 25% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 0% | 96 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP held within the floor in all twelve categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate performance ma · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 46 → 87 of 91
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 40 → 25 of 69
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invoicing software | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 23 of 71 |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 46 → 95 of 99 |
| Rebate management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 80 of 80, unchanged |
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 89 of 102, unchanged |
| Financial close manageme | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 66 → 85 of 85 |
| Procure-to-pay | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 26 of 87, unchanged |
| Corporate tax provision | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 101 of 102, unchanged |
| FP&A platforms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 41 → 63 of 74 |
| Disclosure reporting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 21 of 63, unchanged |
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 122 → 92 of 105 |
| Internal controls | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 68 → 55 of 90 |
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 96 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels1
Comparative18 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained15 labels1
Scale-constrained16 labelsNone
Negative34 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative108 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best overall broad suite: Coupa, Ivalua, SAP Ariba, JAGGAER, GEP” GPT-5.4 mini · Procure-to-pay · comparative prompt · first choice
“dedicated procurement modules within an ERP (like NetSuite, SAP, or Sage Intacct) where approvals are logged immutably” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal controls · negative prompt · alternative
“Consider Onventis, JAGGAER, Ivalua, or SAP if your needs are more specialized, international, or enterprise-like” GPT-5.4 mini · Procure-to-pay · direct prompt · alternative
“Deep native integration with SAP ERP systems; multi-cloud SaaS offering” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial consolidation · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“You want to avoid legacy giants (like Oracle or SAP) due to their high licensing and consulting costs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid assuming your ERP\u2019s built-in tax tool can calculate your income tax provision.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate tax provision · negative prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget | Oracle / SAP / Anaplan” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · hard negative
“do not have the massive IT resources or multi-million dollar budgets required to support traditional enterprise software (like Oracle Hyperion or SAP)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate performance ma · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP, over the 108 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP, over the 108 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 85 of the 108 answers that named SAP and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com42
worldmetrics.org25
gitnux.org21
gartner.com18
cubesoftware.com17
guideflow.com17
highradius.com16
learn.g2.com16
prophix.com16
forbes.com15
203 of the 203 domain citations in answers naming SAP came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAP takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAP takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “epm software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “epm platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 135,000 a month (“sap”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 74,309 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,214,514 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 117,113 · 18,594 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 113,777
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 68 clicks and $1,251 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 95 of 99 in corporate performance ma
Segment leader
22%
Planful
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 108 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 85 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sap.com
20,663
subdomains included
Content
2,976
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,426
Product · Integration
1,660 · 3,500
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 1,797 | 92 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Blog | 677 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 183 | 0 | 2023-08-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 146 | 0 | 2026-05-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 98 | 0 | 2025-04-01 | ||
| Case study | 29 | 0 | 2023-10-01 | ||
| Comparison | 21 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 13 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-24 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Submissions officially open 2027 sap innovation awards news or press
- 2026-09-28Coming soon customer influence feedback experience news or press
- 2026-09-28Sap nvidia openshell auditable ai agents enterprise systems news or press
- 2026-09-28Sap connect 2026 media analyst program news or press
- 2026-09-24Sap apphaus network partner bluestonex builds the bridge news or press
- 2026-09-24Autonomous enterprise podcast lesssons 16 executive conversations podcast or video
Events in person
Upcoming
- April 6, 2027 to April 8, 2027SAP ALM Summit North America 2027SAP America, Inc., Newtown Square, United States · hosts
As the event pages on sap.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sap.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as SAP
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP (ERP/BI suite) 1SAP (SAP Analytics Cloud / SAP BPC) 1
Follow SAP
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SAP is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SAP is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Explore market-leading software and technology from SAP. Become an intelligent, sustainable enterprise with the best in cloud, platform, and sustainability solutions – no matter your industry or size.
- Customers named
- FreseniusMAHLEEdERSACamposol
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What SAP's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sap.com, sap.com/about/trust-center/security/cloud-erp-security.html, sap.com/products/a-z.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.