Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 16 → 30 of 101
1 category · Named, not rankedPeopleGoal
7Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PeopleGoal was named 2 times in Corporate performance ma, where Planful led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business31 of 116
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market29 of 99
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PeopleGoal for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 29 of 99 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PeopleGoal held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate performance ma · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 11 → 44 of 91
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate performance ma | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 29 of 99 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PeopleGoal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PeopleGoal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 label1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need something even cheaper, PeopleGoal or 15Five at $4/user/month work for very small teams” Kimi K2 · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative
“start with PeopleGoal or 15Five at ~$4/user/month” Muse Glimmer 30B · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PeopleGoal, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeopleGoal was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PeopleGoal, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeopleGoal was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PeopleGoal. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named PeopleGoal and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
peoplegoal.comYour site7
learn.g2.com5
softwaresuggest.com5
effy.ai4
kanbanchi.com4
peoplemanagingpeople.com4
selecthub.com4
cubesoftware.com3
golimelight.com3
management.org3
Thirty-five of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming PeopleGoal came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
peoplegoal.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PeopleGoal takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
peoplegoal.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PeopleGoal takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “epm software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “epm platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“peoplegoal”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 138,194 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 11,300 · 541 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,941
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 video · 1 shown in the last 30 days
First shown September 2026, as Batia Infotech, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 29 of 99 in corporate performance ma
Segment leader
22%
Planful
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 7 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on peoplegoal.com
539
subdomains included
Content
454
counted in the table below
Documentation
64
Product · Integration
8 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 403 | 4 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Comparison | 23 | 10 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | 0 | 2021-04-23 | ||
| Case study | 8 | 0 | 2019-09-25 | ||
| Report or ebook | 7 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2020-09-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2021-06-04 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2020-09-17 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Synergita alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-16Primalogik alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-16Small improvements alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-10Performance management software manufacturing blog
- 2026-09-09Performance management software for accounting firms blog
- 2026-09-04Workleap officevibes alternatives comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page peoplegoal.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow PeopleGoal
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PeopleGoal is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PeopleGoal is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Performance Management Software to 3x Employee Productivity, Delightfully
- For
- businesses
- Price stated
- Free Plan; Per User, Per Month peoplegoal.com
- Starting price
- 0 peoplegoal.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free Plan peoplegoal.com
- Certifications
- GDPR compliantGDPR & Privacy Compliance
- Hosting
- Heroku EU servers
- Customers named
- Leica GeosystemsiQmetrixViva WalletLuminor BankAtawayAbu Dhabi UniversityHealth-AdeSoftomotive
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What PeopleGoal's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: peoplegoal.com, peoplegoal.com, peoplegoal.com/pricing, peoplegoal.com/features, peoplegoal.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PeopleGoal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PeopleGoal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PeopleGoal by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PeopleGoal is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PeopleGoal, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.