AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Sphera · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Sphera

35Judge labels
0First choices
9Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in ESG and carbon reporting for mid-market buyers
Rank 27 of 110 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Sphera →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In esg and carbon reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sphera for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
ESG and carbon reportingEquity and corporate0%27 of 11018%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Sphera held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · ESG and carbon reporting · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 84 → 101 of 106
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 23 → 27 of 96
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 18 → 10 of 75

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
ESG and carbon reporting0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 23 → 27 of 110

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Sphera across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01012
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501102
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Industrial mid-market companies where physical safety risks and environmental emissions are closely linked.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · alternative
“Often a fit for companies focused on sustainability data, EHS, and supply-chain/environmental performance” GPT-5.4 mini · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
“for mid-market (100-1,000), Sphera, Greenstone, and Sweep” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
“A natural fit for industrial or asset-heavy businesses.” GPT-6 Luna · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise platforms like Sphera, IBM Envizi, or Diligent ESG are often overkill (and overpriced) for companies under ~500 employees” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · negative prompt · soft negative
“enterprise platforms like Workiva, Sphera, or Enverus are frequently criticized for their steep learning curves” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sphera, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sphera was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Workiva28 of 3513Not among the top eight
Persefoni22 of 350Not among the top eight
Watershed21 of 354Not among the top eight
IBM Envizi17 of 350Not among the top eight
Greenly13 of 355Not among the top eight
Sweep12 of 350Not among the top eight
Novisto11 of 351Not among the top eight
Diligent ESG11 of 350Not among the top eight
Position Green8 of 351Not among the top eight
Microsoft Cloud for Sustainability8 of 350Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sphera. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 35 answers that named Sphera and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

sphera.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sphera takes 0% of first choices and Greenly takes 36%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “esg reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “esg reporting platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,900 a month (“sphera”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
90 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 10,197 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,061 · 152 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,182
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 69 text, 39 image, 12 video · 85 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2024, as Sphera Solutions, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 73 in the year, 47 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 110 in ESG and carbon reporting
Segment leader
36%
Greenly
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
35 answers
Its own site cited
in 33 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sphera.com
2,207
subdomains included
Content
1,569
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
153 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog53982026-09-24Accounting software
News or press27942026-09-22
Webinar or virtual event20102025-09-05
Report or ebook16522026-09-15Accounting software
Conference or event15001970-01-01
Case study9332026-09-02
Podcast or video6102025-03-07
Glossary or explainer5512026-08-31
Template or tool2102025-10-15
Comparison502024-03-13

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on sphera.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sphera.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Sphera

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Sphera is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Unify risk, safety and sustainability with Sphera’s AI-powered Operational Intelligence Platform to drive compliance, resilience and smarter performance.
For
business
Hosting
Global
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, customers

What Sphera's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sphera.com, sphera.com/solutions/product-stewardship. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sphera's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sphera, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sphera by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Sphera is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sphera, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sphera.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.