Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 27 → 22 of 106
1 category · RankedPlan A
25Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in ESG and carbon reporting for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 110 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Plan A →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business24 of 110
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market7 of 110
3%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise20 of 86
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In esg and carbon reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Plan A for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESG and carbon reporting | Equity and corporate | 3% | 7 of 110 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Plan A held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · ESG and carbon reporting · by segment
Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 4 → 6 of 96
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 41 → 19 of 75
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESG and carbon reporting | 10% | 4% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 7 of 110 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Plan A across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Plan A across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase11 labels1
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Sweep or Plan A would be the top recommendations” MiniMax M2.5 · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · first choice
“1. Plan A – Best Overall for Mid-Market” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ESG and carbon reporting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Greenly or Plan A are often positioned as accessible SMB/mid-market options with guided UX and automated data collection.” Perplexity Sonar · ESG and carbon reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Need structured reporting, CSRD/ISSB templates and decarbonisation roadmaps on a mid-market budget → Plan A or Coolset.” Muse Glimmer 30B · ESG and carbon reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Plan A, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Plan A was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Plan A, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Plan A was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Plan A. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Plan A and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
onestopesg.com16
manglai.io13
coolset.com10
keyesg.com9
f6s.com8
fanruan.com8
greenly.earth8
knowesg.com8
persefoni.com8
techtarget.com8
Ninety-six of the ninety-six domain citations in answers naming Plan A came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
plana.earth is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Plan A takes 3% of first choices and Greenly takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
plana.earth is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Plan A takes 3% of first choices and Greenly takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “esg reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “esg reporting platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 4,400 a month (“plan a”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 685,726 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 31,908 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,876 · 206 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,948
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
3%
rank 7 of 110 in ESG and carbon reporting
Segment leader
36%
Greenly
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 25 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 25 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on plana.earth
1,125
subdomains included
Content
247
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 208 | 0 | 2023-05-25 | Accounting software | |
| Report or ebook | 20 | undated | ESG and carbon reporting | ||
| News or press | 8 | undated | |||
| Case study | 7 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| Blog | 1 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2023-05-25How to prepare your business for the CSRD: Are you ready? glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page plana.earth exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Plan A
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Plan A is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Plan A is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Carbon Accounting Software
- For
- businesses
- Certifications
- Certified GHG Protocol compliantTÜV Rheinland certifiedB Corp certifiedCertified data security standards
- Hosting
- ParisBerlin
- Customers named
- StryberSorareAmpecoWecasaPayhawkMollie
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What Plan A's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: plana.earth. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Plan A's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Plan A, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Plan A by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Plan A is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Plan A, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.