Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 82 → 98 of 106
1 category · Named, not rankedPosition Green
17Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Position Green was named 4 times in ESG and carbon reporting, where Greenly led with 36%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business103 of 110
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 110
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise18 of 86
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In esg and carbon reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Position Green for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESG and carbon reporting | Equity and corporate | 2% | 15 of 110 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Greenly at 36% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Position Green held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · ESG and carbon reporting · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 26 → 14 of 96
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 21 → 16 of 75
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESG and carbon reporting | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 15 of 110 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Position Green across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Position Green across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd suggest Position Green or Novata as the starting point” Kimi K2 · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · first choice
“For European markets: Position Green or Novisto” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Position Green, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Position Green was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Position Green, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Position Green was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Position Green. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Position Green and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
onestopesg.com14
tracera.com10
guideflow.com9
g2.com8
toolradar.com8
fanruan.com7
linkedin.com7
energycap.com6
techtarget.com6
wardn.com6
Eighty-one of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming Position Green came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
positiongreen.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Position Green takes 2% of first choices and Greenly takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
positiongreen.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Position Green takes 2% of first choices and Greenly takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “esg reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “esg reporting platforms”
9
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“position green”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 259 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 644 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 439 · 19 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 972
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 15 of 110 in ESG and carbon reporting
Segment leader
36%
Greenly
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 17 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on positiongreen.com
554
subdomains included
Content
404
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 247 | undated | Supplier management | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 67 | undated | |||
| Case study | 35 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 31 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 10 | 0 | 2026-03-01 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | undated | |||
| News or press | 5 | 0 | 2025-10-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-03-01Position Green launches ROI Calculator to help companies quantify the business value of sustainability.pdf template or tool
- 2025-10-01Press release Sustainable business playbook.pdf news or press
- 2025-05-01Press release Handels x PG.pdf news or press
- 2024-06-01Press hitachi digital services pg 2023 FINAL.pdf news or press
- 2024-06-01Press brussels office 2023.pdf news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page positiongreen.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Position Green
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Position Green is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Position Green is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- ESG software that turns sustainability into business impact
- For
- ESG software for leaders who want clarity and control
- Certifications
- SOC 2 complianceEU GDPRUK GDPR
- Customers named
- Espresso House GroupDPG MediaWaystoneWallenius WilhelmsenEspresso HouseEleikoCegalVBG Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Position Green's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: positiongreen.com, trust.positiongreen.com, positiongreen.com/insights/customer-stories, positiongreen.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Position Green's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Position Green, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Position Green by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Position Green is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Position Green, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.