Mid-marketgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
1 category · Named, not rankedProcore Pay
4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Procore Pay was named 1 time in Contractor payments, where Tipalti led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market32 of 98
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise17 of 75
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In contractor payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Procore Pay for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contractor payments | Spend and procurement | 0% | 32 of 98 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Tipalti at 22% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Procore Pay held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Contractor payments · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 16 of 70, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contractor payments | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 32 of 98 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Procore Pay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Procore Pay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you are a general contractor paying subs on jobsites, Procore Pay, BuildPay/GCPay, CoConstruct/Buildertrend and Levelset-type tools are the relevant set.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Contractor payments · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Procore Pay, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Procore Pay was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Procore Pay, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Procore Pay was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Procore Pay. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Procore Pay and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
worksuite.com4
constructionplacements.com3
deel.com3
g2.com3
4dev.com2
guideflow.com2
kolena.com2
learn.g2.com2
remote.com2
wise.com2
Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Procore Pay came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on procore.com
9,982
subdomains included
Content
2,720
counted in the table below
Documentation
3,488
Product · Integration
44 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,521 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 396 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 343 | undated | |||
| News or press | 229 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 89 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 76 | 0 | 2015-03-02 | ||
| Podcast or video | 50 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 8 | 0 | 2020-04-02 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 0 | 2020-06-18 | ||
| Case study | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2020-06-18Compare bids in portfolio financials comparison
- 2020-04-02How can i use the nextwave safety solutions ladder safety simple checklist inspection template on my project template or tool
- 2020-04-02How can i use the oac management inc pre backfill checklist inspection template on my project template or tool
- 2020-04-02How can i use the oac management inc pre drywall checklist inspection template on my project template or tool
- 2020-04-02How can i use the oac management inc pre roofing checklist inspection template on my project template or tool
- 2020-04-02How can i use the procore equipment pre operation checklist inspection template on my project template or tool
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page procore.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Procore Pay
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Procore Pay is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Procore Pay is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Integrations claimed
- 500 procore.com/platform
- Certifications
- SOC 1 (Type 2)SOC 2 (Type 2)ISO-27001-2022FedRAMP®SSAE 18SOC 1 & 2 Type 2ISO 27001 CertifiedISO/IEC 27001:2022
- Customers named
- BernardsDataBankCatalyzePitt Meadows PlumbingMcCownGordonAWSWipfliBalfour Beatty
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Procore Pay's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: procore.com, procore.com/pricing, trust.procore.com, procore.com/platform, procore.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Procore Pay's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Procore Pay, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Procore Pay by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Procore Pay is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Procore Pay, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.