| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contractor payments | Spend and procurement | 20% | 2 of 98 | 15% | 52 | accepted challenger | ▼−5Since September 2026: 27% → 23%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Entity management | Equity and corporate | 0% | 65 of 81 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 123 of 136 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contractor payments | 27% | 23% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 27% → 23%, −5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 → 2 of 98 |
| Entity management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 65 of 81, unchanged |
| Global e-invoicing compl | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 123 of 136, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd suggest Deel or Papaya Global as the top choices. Deel offers the most comprehensive platform with strong compliance features” MiniMax M2.5 · Contractor payments · direct prompt · first choice
“the strongest single-platform choice is usually Deel if you want contractor payments plus 1099/tax compliance in one system” Perplexity Sonar · Contractor payments · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Deel if you have international contractors, or Tipalti if you want maximum automation” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contractor payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Deel is recommended for its global contractor compliance and cross-border payroll capabilities” Llama 4 Maverick · Contractor payments · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Opaque or very high fees (Deel Payroll, certain freelancing-site payout tools)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contractor payments · negative prompt · hard negative
“Primarily an EOR/HR platform, so avoid if pure e-invoicing is needed.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Global e-invoicing compl · negative prompt · hard negative
“High fees for transactions/withdrawals and payment delays/notifications are common criticisms, despite strong compliance features.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contractor payments · negative prompt · soft negative
“Deel enforces strict late-payment fees ... has been known to put a hard lock on freelancer payouts” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contractor payments · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 170 of the 177 answers that named Deel and are not a share of its labels.
557 of the 640 domain citations in answers naming Deel came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,655 | 41 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 567 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 252 | undated | |||
| Case study | 215 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 133 | 4 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Template or tool | 38 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 19 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on deel.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page deel.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Deel's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: deel.com, deel.com/pricing, trust.deel.com, deel.com/solutions, deel.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Deel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Deel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Deel by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Deel is among the products AI models recommend first in Contractor payments this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.