| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional services automation | Receivables and billing | 12% | 3 of 99 | 0% | 23 | accepted challenger | |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 2% | 17 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best financial reporting software for a company with a limited budget includes Productive, Sage Intacct, Datarails, Fathom, and Zoho Books.” Llama 4 Maverick · Financial reporting · budget prompt · first choice
“Productive stands out as one of the most affordable full-featured professional services automation (PSA) platforms” Grok 4.1 Fast · PSA · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value (True PSA Features): Productive ... widely considered the best fit for SMBs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PSA · budget prompt · first choice
“Productive (starting at $9/user/month) or Teamwork.com ... offer the best overall value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PSA · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 58 answers that named Productive and are not a share of its labels.
232 of the 264 domain citations in answers naming Productive came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,288 | 28 | 2026-09-27 | ||
| Comparison | 188 | 2 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 63 | 6 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Case study | 46 | 1 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 28 | 0 | 2023-11-20 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2026-06-09 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2022-02-28 |
Every page productive.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Productive's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: productive.io, productive.io/pricing, trust.productive.io, productive.io/use-cases/reporting, productive.io/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Productive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Productive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Productive by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Productive is among the products AI models recommend first in Professional services automation this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.