AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Productive · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Productive

58Judge labels
15First choices
2Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in PSA for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 99 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 23 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Productive →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In psa · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Productive for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Professional services automationReceivables and billing12%3 of 990%23accepted challenger
Financial reporting and dashboardsPlanning and analysis2%17 of 1050%1under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Productive yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Productive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510102
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash03003
Perplexity Sonar11002
Grok 4.1 Fast11103
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash11002
Llama 4 Maverick11002
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10102
MiniMax M2.502103
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels2
Paraphrase11 labels2
Comparative16 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained15 labels10
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative58 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best financial reporting software for a company with a limited budget includes Productive, Sage Intacct, Datarails, Fathom, and Zoho Books.” Llama 4 Maverick · Financial reporting · budget prompt · first choice
“Productive stands out as one of the most affordable full-featured professional services automation (PSA) platforms” Grok 4.1 Fast · PSA · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value (True PSA Features): Productive ... widely considered the best fit for SMBs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PSA · budget prompt · first choice
“Productive (starting at $9/user/month) or Teamwork.com ... offer the best overall value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PSA · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Productive, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Productive was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Certinia Professional Services Cloud16 of 580Not among the top eight
Ruddr8 of 582Not among the top eight
ConnectWise PSA8 of 580Not among the top eight
Wrike7 of 582Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Productive. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 58 answers that named Productive and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

scoro.com39
bigtime.net34
productive.ioYour site32
kantata.com26
teamwork.com26
learn.g2.com24
rocketlane.com22
guideflow.com21
assembly.com20
g2.com20

232 of the 264 domain citations in answers naming Productive came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

productive.io ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Productive takes 12% of first choices and BigTime takes 29%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “professional services automation platform”
3
Position for “professional services automation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
60,500 a month (“productive”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1,234,021 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 102,038 a month
Searches its site ranks for
12,339 · 893 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,094
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 44 clicks and $1,647 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 67 text, 43 video, 10 image · 61 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2023, as The Productive Company, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 67 in the year, 53 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
12%
rank 3 of 99 in PSA
Segment leader
29%
BigTime
First choices
15 across its categories
Named in
58 answers
Its own site cited
in 58 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on productive.io
2,594
subdomains included
Content
1,628
counted in the table below
Documentation
657
Product · Integration
6 · 21
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,288282026-09-27
Comparison18822026-08-04
Glossary or explainer6362026-09-24
Case study4612026-09-14
Webinar or virtual event2802023-11-20
Report or ebook802026-06-09
Template or tool532026-09-22
Conference or event1undated
News or press102022-02-28
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page productive.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Productive

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Productive is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Agency Management & Professional Services Automation Software
For
agencies, consultancies, and other professional services businesses
Price stated
Free 14-day trial. No credit card required. Cancel any time. productive.io
Starting price
$10 /month productive.io/pricing
Free plan or trial
Free 14-day trial. No credit card required. Cancel any time. productive.io
Integrations claimed
1000 productive.io/pricing
Certifications
GDPR ComplianceSOC 2 Type II ComplianceSOC 2 Compliance
Customers named
SaffronMakerstreet Marketing & InnovationDegordianSquare1 SoftwareEnkiPorsche Digital CroatiaInnovate By DaySNCE
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What Productive's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: productive.io, productive.io/pricing, trust.productive.io, productive.io/use-cases/reporting, productive.io/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Productive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Productive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Productive by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Productive is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Productive, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at productive.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Productive is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Productive is among the products AI models recommend first in Professional services automation this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Professional services automation, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://finance-ai-index.com/receivables/professional-services-automation/"><img src="https://finance-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/productive--professional-services-automation-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Professional services automation, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Professional services automation standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Professional services automation, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://finance-ai-index.com/receivables/professional-services-automation/"><img src="https://finance-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/productive--professional-services-automation-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Professional services automation, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Professional services automation standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Professional services automation, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://finance-ai-index.com/receivables/professional-services-automation/"><img src="https://finance-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/productive--professional-services-automation-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Professional services automation, October 2026 Edition, Finance AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Professional services automation standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.