Every category where a model named Wrike for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Professional services automation	Receivables and billing	0%	80 of 99	43%	7	under 10 labels · led by BigTime at 29%
Entity management	Equity and corporate	0%	77 of 81	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	76 of 99	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wrike yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wrike across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	2	4
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	2	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labels2

Scale-constrained1 label1

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Wrike: more flexible work-management platform with PSA capabilities.” GPT-5.4 mini · PSA · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“if you need a "pure" PSA, because one industry analysis notes that some vendors market themselves primarily as project management” Perplexity Sonar · PSA · negative prompt · soft negative

“it is really a work delivery platform ... rather than a purpose-built entity database” Perplexity Sonar · Entity management · comparative prompt · soft negative

“Users report high and inflexible pricing structure and frequent minor bugs and glitches.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Entity management · negative prompt · soft negative

“Time tracking and billing/profitability features often require add-ons.” Mistral Small · PSA · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wrike, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wrike was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BigTime14 of 303Not among the top eight

Kantata11 of 303Not among the top eight

Scoro9 of 300Not among the top eight

ClickUp8 of 301Not among the top eight

Accelo8 of 300Not among the top eight

Monday.com8 of 300Not among the top eight

Asana7 of 302Not among the top eight

Productive7 of 302Not among the top eight

Teamwork.com7 of 301Not among the top eight

Avaza6 of 300Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wrike. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Wrike and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com16

learn.g2.com15

bigtime.net12

softwareadvice.com12

capterra.com11

teamwork.com10

guideflow.com9

kantata.com9

rocketlane.com9

thedigitalprojectmanager.com9

112 of the 112 domain citations in answers naming Wrike came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-professional-services-automation-software13

bigtime.net/blogs/what-is-psa-software9

kantata.com/blog/article/best-professional-services-automation-software8

g2.com/categories/professional-services-automation7

scoro.com/blog/psa-software-examples7

guideflow.com/blog/professional-services-automation-software6

larksuite.com/en_us/blog/enterprise-project-management-software6

rocketlane.com/blogs/best-psa-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

wrike.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Wrike takes 0% of first choices and BigTime takes 29%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “professional services automation platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “professional services automation platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 27,100 a month (“wrike”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 623 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 703,499 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 50,414 · 3,904 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 23,552
Paid Google search: 3 searches its ads show for, about 1,931 clicks and $21,691 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

119+ ads · 106 text, 8 video, 5 image · 50 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2022, as Wrike, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 77 in the year, 42 before. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 80 of 99 in PSA

Segment leader

29%

BigTime

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 30 answers
Its own site cited: in 30 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on wrike.com

6,009

subdomains included

Content

2,517

counted in the table below

Documentation

331

Product · Integration

51 · 59

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	1,335	2	2026-09-10
Glossary or explainer	422	0	2025-04-24
News or press	224	undated
Webinar or virtual event	169	undated
Report or ebook	99	0	2018-10-30
Case study	88	undated
Template or tool	87	undated
Comparison	75	1	2026-09-03
Conference or event	16	undated
Podcast or video	2	0	2022-06-21

Most recent

2026-09-10How an ai agent protects deep work for one creative team blog
2026-09-03Airtable alternatives comparison
2026-08-05Collaborate 2026 blog
2026-05-22Hive alternatives comparison
2025-08-12Ai agents in project management blog
2025-04-24What is an action plan with example glossary or explainer

Events in person

Upcoming

October 21, 2026User group experience with Wrike in MelbourneGTP Space&Co 530 Colines Lvl 3, 530 Collins Street, Melbourne VIC 3000, Melbourne · hosts

As the event pages on wrike.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page wrike.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Wrike

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Wrike is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-powered enterprise work management software
wrike.com
For: enterprise
wrike.com
Price stated: Free $0 user/month; Team $10 user/month; Business $25 user/month; Pinnacle Contact us; Apex Contact us wrike.com/marketing/pricing
Starting price: 0 wrike.com/marketing/pricing
Free plan or trial: Try Wrike for free wrike.com
Integrations claimed: 400 wrike.com
Certifications: SOC2 Type IIISO 27001:2013ISO 27018:2019CSA STAREU & US and Swiss & US Privacy Shield-certifiedGDPR-compliantCCPA-compliantAICPA
Hosting: San Jose, CaliforniaAmsterdam, the Netherlands
Customers named: OglivySiemensTmobileAvevaLyftSchneider ElectricAbbNVIDIA

What Wrike's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: wrike.com, wrike.com/marketing/pricing, wrike.com/security, wrike.com/use-cases, wrike.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wrike's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wrike, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Wrike by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Wrike is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Wrike, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.