AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Projectworks · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Projectworks

10Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Projectworks was named 3 times in PSA, where BigTime led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In psa · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Projectworks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Professional services automationReceivables and billing2%10 of 990%3under 10 labels · led by BigTime at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Projectworks yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Projectworks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase4 labels2
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Projectworks: Best Overall for Mid-Sized Consulting & Professional Services ... is highly recommended” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PSA · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best for: Consulting firms that want to grow and scale.” Mistral Small · PSA · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Projectworks, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Projectworks was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BigTime9 of 102Not among the top eight
Kantata6 of 101Not among the top eight
Certinia Professional Services Cloud5 of 100Not among the top eight
Accelo4 of 100Not among the top eight
Productive4 of 100Not among the top eight
Scoro4 of 100Not among the top eight
Teamwork.com3 of 101Not among the top eight
NetSuite SuiteProjects Pro2 of 101Not among the top eight
Wrike2 of 101Not among the top eight
Avaza2 of 100Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Projectworks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Projectworks and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bigtime.net6
guideflow.com5
scoro.com5
uplandsoftware.com5
accelo.com4
assembly.com4
oneplan.ai4
projectworks.comYour site4
rocketlane.com4
teamwork.com4

Forty-one of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Projectworks came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

projectworks.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Projectworks takes 2% of first choices and BigTime takes 29%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “professional services automation platform”
8
Position for “professional services automation platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
320 a month (“projectworks”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
14 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 5,046 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,503 · 56 in the top three
Sites linking to it
830
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
42 ads · 36 text, 5 image, 1 video · 9 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2022, as SPIDERWORKS LIMITED, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 30 in the year, 12 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 99 in PSA
Segment leader
29%
BigTime
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
10 answers
Its own site cited
in 10 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on projectworks.com
844
subdomains included
Content
389
counted in the table below
Documentation
334
Product · Integration
8 · 20
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog278422026-10-02PSA, Invoicing software
Comparison4062026-09-27PSA
Podcast or video2692026-09-23
Case study2202025-11-26
Webinar or virtual event1222026-09-29
Template or tool612026-09-23
Glossary or explainer322026-09-23PSA
Conference or event102025-11-24
Report or ebook112026-08-27
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page projectworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Projectworks

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Projectworks is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Powerful, yet easy-to-use professional services automation software that unites resource planning, time tracking, invoicing, and forecasting in one platform.
For
consulting firms
Price stated
Build $17 / monthly per user; Scale $24 / monthly per user; Unleash $41 / monthly per user; Enterprise Custom projectworks.com/pricing
Starting price
17 projectworks.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Try Projectworks yourself - free. No credit card, no hassle. projectworks.com
Integrations claimed
20 projectworks.com · 19 projectworks.com/pricing pages disagree
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2DCAA readySoc 2 Type 2 certified
Hosting
Microsoft Azure
Customers named
ScendeaAlliance Biotech SolutionsMBBbdnaProvoke SolutionsCT Management GroupOculusUniverus

What Projectworks's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: projectworks.com, projectworks.com/pricing, trust.projectworks.com, projectworks.com/features/ai, projectworks.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Projectworks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Projectworks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Projectworks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Projectworks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Projectworks, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at projectworks.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.