Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 52 of 77, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedProposify
7Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Proposify was named 2 times in Financial close manageme and 1 other category, where FloQast led with 55%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market57 of 85
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In financial close manageme · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Proposify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial close management | Accounting and close | 0% | 57 of 85 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 0% | 61 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Proposify held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial close manageme · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial close manageme | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 57 of 85, unchanged |
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Proposify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Proposify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Proposify is a more budget-friendly alternative (starting ~$19/month)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Proposify, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Proposify was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Proposify, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Proposify was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Proposify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Proposify and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
clarity-ventures.com5
guideflow.com4
inventive.ai4
sifthub.io4
g2.com3
gartner.com3
loopio.com3
proqsmart.com3
responsive.io3
rfp.wiki3
Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Proposify came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
proposify.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Proposify takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 55%.ShowHide
Search and answers
proposify.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Proposify takes 0% of first choices and FloQast takes 55%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “close management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial close management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“proposify”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 28 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 38,103 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,613 · 527 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,440
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 57 of 85 in financial close manageme
Segment leader
55%
FloQast
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 7 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on proposify.com
660
subdomains included
Content
475
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
10 · 15
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 417 | 4 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Comparison | 26 | 2 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Case study | 16 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2025-11-05 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-15Learn how to write and present a pricing proposal with confidence. discover what to include how to structure pricing com blog
- 2026-09-15Clientpoint alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-08Statement of work vs proposal comparison
- 2026-09-08Is proposify right for you blog
- 2026-08-18Best sales closing productivity tools blog
- 2026-08-18Sales closing statistics blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page proposify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Proposify
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Proposify is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Proposify is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Proposal Software to Streamline Your Sales Process
- For
- sales teams
- Price stated
- Basic, Team, Business proposify.com
- Starting price
- 19 proposify.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start free trial proposify.com
- Certifications
- GDPRSOC2 Type 2PCI-DSS
- Customers named
- FernSeraphEverLineWe Treat360cleanAbdoADT CybersecurityDimensional Innovations
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Proposify's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: proposify.com, proposify.com/pricing, trust.proposify.com, proposify.com/platform/api, proposify.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Proposify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Proposify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Proposify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Proposify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Proposify, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.