Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 17 → 5 of 158
2 categories · Named, not rankedLoopio
16Judge labels
5First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Loopio was named 6 times in Strategic sourcing and 1 other category, where oboloo led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 166
5%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 128
4%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise16 of 77
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Loopio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 4% | 10 of 128 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 0% | 37 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Loopio held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Strategic sourcing · by segment
Mid-market▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 25 → 9 of 120
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 9 → 12 of 63
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 5% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 10 of 128 |
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 77, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Loopio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Loopio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase15 labels5
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd suggest starting with Loopio if your primary need is RFP response management, or Precoro if you need broader procurement automation” MiniMax M2.5 · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Loopio and Scout RFP are the top recommendations due to their strong feature sets, ease of use, and positive user reviews” Mistral Small · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Loopio is the market leader for mid-sized and enterprise teams... Caveat: Pricing is quote-based and typically starts around $20,000+ per year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“for a mid-sized B2B sales function handling inbound RFPs, Loopio is the most cited mid-market RFP automation platform” Muse Glimmer 30B · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Loopio, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Loopio was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Loopio, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Loopio was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Loopio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 16 answers that named Loopio and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
clarity-ventures.com10
guideflow.com10
sourceforge.net10
gartner.com9
inventive.ai8
sifthub.io7
g2.com6
responsive.io6
softwareconnect.com6
loopio.comYour site5
Seventy-two of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming Loopio came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
loopio.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Loopio takes 4% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.ShowHide
Search and answers
loopio.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Loopio takes 4% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sourcing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “strategic sourcing software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“loopio”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 80 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,640 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 981 · 117 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,144
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 10 of 128 in strategic sourcing
Segment leader
15%
oboloo
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on loopio.com
471
subdomains included
Content
207
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
13 · 10
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 167 | 14 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 17 | 3 | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Case study | 13 | 0 | 2026-01-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | 2 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | 0 | 2025-09-12 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-03-19 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2026-01-26 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Investment management rfp blog
- 2026-09-17Best ddq software private equity blog
- 2026-09-15Go no go decision blog
- 2026-09-15Mcp webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-03Increase win rate blog
- 2026-09-02Best ai software rfp responses blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page loopio.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Loopio
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Loopio is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Loopio is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI RFP Software with a Competitive Edge
- For
- teams responsible for responding to RFPs, RFIs, DDQs, and security questionnaires
- Price stated
- starting with our Foundations tier, which includes 10 seats; Enhanced or Enterprise package loopio.com
- Integrations claimed
- 275 loopio.com · 80 loopio.com/platform pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IISOC 1SOC 2SOC 3SAML 2.0GDPRCCPAISO 27001
- Customers named
- ZendeskDocuSignAllied UniversalHubSpotCelonisAlightSimCorpNetskope
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Loopio's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: loopio.com, loopio.com/pricing, loopio.com/platform/security, loopio.com/platform, loopio.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Loopio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Loopio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Loopio by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Loopio is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Loopio, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.