Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 123 → 101 of 102
2 categories · Named, not rankedSAP BusinessObjects
11Judge labels
0First choices
11Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SAP BusinessObjects was named 5 times in Financial reporting and 1 other category, where Sage Intacct led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market104 of 105
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise106 of 109
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SAP BusinessObjects for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 104 of 105 | 100% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 92 of 99 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SAP BusinessObjects held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Financial reporting · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 74 → 99 of 101
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 123 → 104 of 105 |
| Corporate performance ma | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 92 of 99, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SAP BusinessObjects across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SAP BusinessObjects across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“many mid-market companies are still tethered to older, unsupported legacy modules that cannot integrate with modern cloud ERPs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · hard negative
“heavyweight enterprise legacy tools are increasingly entering "maintenance mode" or being sunsetted” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequently voted "worst" in BI communities ... avoid unless you're already in that ecosystem.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial reporting · negative prompt · hard negative
“Unmaintained Legacy Systems (e.g., Older Crystal Reports, SAP BO) ... Why to avoid” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial reporting · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP BusinessObjects, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP BusinessObjects was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SAP BusinessObjects, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP BusinessObjects was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP BusinessObjects. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 11 answers that named SAP BusinessObjects and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
improvado.io5
kanerika.com5
linkedin.com4
medium.com4
rollstack.com4
swydo.com4
axis-intelligence.com3
domo.com3
nubela.co3
reddit.com3
Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming SAP BusinessObjects came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAP BusinessObjects takes 0% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sap.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SAP BusinessObjects takes 0% of first choices and Sage Intacct takes 33%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “reporting tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial reporting software”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,214,514 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 117,113 · 18,594 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 113,777
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 68 clicks and $1,251 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 104 of 105 in financial reporting
Segment leader
33%
Sage Intacct
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 11 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sap.com
20,663
subdomains included
Content
2,976
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,426
Product · Integration
1,660 · 3,500
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 1,797 | 92 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Blog | 677 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 183 | 0 | 2023-08-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 146 | 0 | 2026-05-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 98 | 0 | 2025-04-01 | ||
| Case study | 29 | 0 | 2023-10-01 | ||
| Comparison | 21 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 13 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-24 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Submissions officially open 2027 sap innovation awards news or press
- 2026-09-28Coming soon customer influence feedback experience news or press
- 2026-09-28Sap nvidia openshell auditable ai agents enterprise systems news or press
- 2026-09-28Sap connect 2026 media analyst program news or press
- 2026-09-24Sap apphaus network partner bluestonex builds the bridge news or press
- 2026-09-24Autonomous enterprise podcast lesssons 16 executive conversations podcast or video
Events in person
Upcoming
- April 6, 2027 to April 8, 2027SAP ALM Summit North America 2027SAP America, Inc., Newtown Square, United States · hosts
As the event pages on sap.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sap.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as SAP BusinessObjects
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP BusinessObjects; a claim can dispute any of them.
BusinessObjects 1SAP BO 1SAP BusinessObjects / Crystal Reports (Legacy) 1
Follow SAP BusinessObjects
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP BusinessObjects's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP BusinessObjects, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP BusinessObjects by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SAP BusinessObjects is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP BusinessObjects, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.