| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 38 of 105 | 30% | 10 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 51 of 102 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SaaS metrics and analytics | Planning and analysis | 0% | 69 of 78 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 67 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Financial reporting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 38 of 105 |
| Financial consolidation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 68 → 51 of 102 |
| SaaS metrics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 69 of 78, unchanged |
| Board | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 67 of 99, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Domo provides a unified platform for teams that want to consolidate integration, visualization, and AI.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
“A rapid-deployment, all-in-one BI and data integration platform.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for cross-functional executive dashboards: Domo” GPT-5.4 mini · SaaS metrics · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“too heavy and expensive for early-stage SaaS companies” Mistral Small · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · hard negative
“Expensive — usage-based pricing has been cited as $20K+/year ... Pricing unpredictability is a known pain point” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · soft negative
“highly criticized for its pricing obscurity... costs can spike dramatically and unexpectedly” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Unreliable connectors and data management issues, especially for integrations.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial reporting · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 36 answers that named Domo and are not a share of its labels.
Seventy-four of the ninety-two domain citations in answers naming Domo came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 1,071 | undated | |||
| Blog | 733 | undated | |||
| News or press | 361 | undated | |||
| Case study | 150 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 148 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 130 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 113 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 87 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Every page domo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Domo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: domo.com, domo.com/pricing, domo.com/platform/security, domo.com/platform, domo.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Domo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Domo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Domo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: