AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › SAP Sustainability Control Tower · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

SAP Sustainability Control Tower

30Judge labels
1First choices
12Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in ESG and carbon reporting for enterprise buyers
Rank 35 of 110 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In esg and carbon reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAP Sustainability Control Tower for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
ESG and carbon reportingEquity and corporate0%35 of 1100%3under 10 labels · led by Greenly at 36%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, SAP Sustainability Control Tower held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · ESG and carbon reporting · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 86 → 102 of 106
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 17 → 33 of 96
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 29 → 9 of 75

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
ESG and carbon reporting0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 17 → 35 of 110

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated SAP Sustainability Control Tower across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501203
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Deep integration with existing SAP infrastructure” MiniMax M2.5 · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP Sustainability Control Tower, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Sustainability Control Tower was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Workiva23 of 308Not among the top eight
Watershed13 of 303Not among the top eight
IBM Envizi12 of 301Not among the top eight
Persefoni10 of 300Not among the top eight
Novisto9 of 301Not among the top eight
Sphera8 of 300Not among the top eight
Greenly7 of 306Not among the top eight
Microsoft Cloud for Sustainability6 of 300Not among the top eight
Position Green5 of 300Not among the top eight
Diligent ESG4 of 300Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Sustainability Control Tower. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named SAP Sustainability Control Tower and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com12
onestopesg.com12
g2.com11
fanruan.com10
us.fitgap.com9
csr-tools.com8
emissiontwin.com8
keyesg.com8
techtarget.com7
tracera.com7

Ninety-two of the ninety-two domain citations in answers naming SAP Sustainability Control Tower came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

sap.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SAP Sustainability Control Tower takes 0% of first choices and Greenly takes 36%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “esg reporting software”
3
Position for “esg reporting platforms”
4
Searches for its name, Google
140 a month (“sap sustainability control tower”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 2,214,514 a month
Searches its site ranks for
117,113 · 18,594 in the top three
Sites linking to it
113,777
Paid Google search
5 searches its ads show for, about 68 clicks and $1,251 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
23+ ads · 21 text, 1 image, 1 video · 23 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2023, as SAP, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 9 in the year, 14 before. 97 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 35 of 110 in ESG and carbon reporting
Segment leader
36%
Greenly
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
30 answers
Its own site cited
in 30 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sap.com
20,663
subdomains included
Content
2,976
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,426
Product · Integration
1,660 · 3,500
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press1,797922026-09-28
Blog677undated
Glossary or explainer18302023-08-01
Conference or event14602026-05-01
Report or ebook9802025-04-01
Case study2902023-10-01
Comparison21undated
Template or tool13undated
Webinar or virtual event10undated
Podcast or video212026-09-24

Events in person

Upcoming

As the event pages on sap.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sap.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as SAP Sustainability Control Tower

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP Sustainability Control Tower; a claim can dispute any of them.
SAP 1

Follow SAP Sustainability Control Tower

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SAP Sustainability Control Tower is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Establish holistic steering and reporting of environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) with the SAP Sustainability Control Tower solution.
Customers named
FreseniusMAHLEEdERSACamposol
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What SAP Sustainability Control Tower's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sap.com, sap.com/about/trust-center/security/cloud-erp-security.html, sap.com/products/a-z.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Sustainability Control Tower's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Sustainability Control Tower, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SAP Sustainability Control Tower by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SAP Sustainability Control Tower is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SAP Sustainability Control Tower, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.