AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › ScaleXP · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

ScaleXP

14Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ScaleXP was named 3 times in Revenue recognition and 1 other category, where Maxio led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In revenue recognition · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ScaleXP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Revenue recognitionAccounting and close0%30 of 770%2under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Financial consolidationAccounting and close0%66 of 1020%1under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 24%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, ScaleXP held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Revenue recognition · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 28 → 12 of 77
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 36 → 40 of 74

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Revenue recognition0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 36 → 30 of 77
Financial consolidation0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 66 of 102, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated ScaleXP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative3 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For SaaS/Subscription Businesses: ScaleXP ... Handles intercompany entries and FX automatically” Kimi K2 · Financial consolidation · budget prompt · alternative
“ScaleXP is pitched as a mid-market automation tool; published tiers start around £100/mo” Muse Glimmer 30B · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · alternative
“Best For: SaaS companies with $1M–50M revenue using Xero/QuickBooks/Zoho Books” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ScaleXP, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ScaleXP was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
QuickBooks Online6 of 141Not among the top eight
Joiin5 of 145Not among the top eight
Xero5 of 141Not among the top eight
Maxio5 of 140Not among the top eight
Zenskar5 of 140Not among the top eight
Flowrev4 of 142Not among the top eight
Chargebee RevRec4 of 141Not among the top eight
Fathom4 of 140Not among the top eight
Zuora Revenue4 of 140Not among the top eight
RightRev3 of 140Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ScaleXP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named ScaleXP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

scalexp.comYour site12
guideflow.com10
wise.com9
zenskar.com8
pipedrive.com7
sourceforge.net7
softwaresuggest.com6
itechguides.com5
capterra.com4
dualentry.com4

Sixty of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming ScaleXP came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on scalexp.com
682
subdomains included
Content
253
counted in the table below
Documentation
19
Product · Integration
0 · 20
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog20002026-06-06Revenue recognition, Financial consolidation
Comparison2822026-07-09Revenue recognition, Accounting software
Case study802026-03-26
Glossary or explainer602025-07-14
Template or tool512026-09-28
Report or ebook412026-08-26
Podcast or video212026-09-21

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page scalexp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow ScaleXP

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ScaleXP is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
An AI-powered finance platform and finance automation for Xero and QuickBooks that automates revenue recognition, invoicing from your CRM, SaaS metrics and board reporting.
For
Growing SaaS companies, agencies, and service businesses; finance teams and founders.
Price stated
See plans and pricing scalexp.com
Starting price
100 scalexp.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
After the demo, you can use our product free for 7 days. scalexp.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2GDPRUK ICOUK ICO regulationsSOC2 type 2 report
Customers named
Summit 17InterrodataCue GroupSquaredUpBarnes & ScottTogetherall GroupGivePanelEU Tech Group
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What ScaleXP's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: scalexp.com, scalexp.com, scalexp.com/pricing, trust.scalexp.com, scalexp.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ScaleXP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ScaleXP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ScaleXP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ScaleXP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ScaleXP, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at scalexp.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.