Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 57 of 120, unchanged
ServiceNow · 1 category · Named, not rankedServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations
4Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations was named 1 time in Strategic sourcing, where oboloo led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market64 of 128
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise33 of 77
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 0% | 64 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Strategic sourcing · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 28 of 63, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 64 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Already using ServiceNow | ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com4
gartner.com2
softwaresuggest.com2
accio.com1
b2bs.com1
erpresearch.com1
f6s.com1
feeds.colab91.com1
gitnux.org1
guideflow.com1
Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
servicenow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations takes 0% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.ShowHide
Search and answers
servicenow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations takes 0% of first choices and oboloo takes 15%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sourcing tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “strategic sourcing software”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- servicenow.com shared with ServiceNow's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 689,216 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 116,065 · 6,894 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 34,197
- Paid Google search
- 10 searches its ads show for, about 63 clicks and $673 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 64 of 128 in strategic sourcing
Segment leader
15%
oboloo
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 4 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 4 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ServiceNow is the company behind ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations.ShowHide
The company
ServiceNow is the company behind ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automate procurement from conversational intake to paid invoice.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: careers.servicenow.com/jobs/744000152727466/senior-advisory-presales-solution-consultant-source-to-pay-solutions. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ServiceNow Source-to-Pay Operations, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.