Every category where a model named Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	0%	19 of 87	20%	10	accepted challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	0%	30 of 111	22%	9	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Spend management platforms	Spend and procurement	0%	32 of 46	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 44%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	0%	122 of 128	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Procure-to-pay · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 71 → 59 of 61

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 51 → 23 of 79

Enterprise▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

6%from 2% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 6 → 4 of 47

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Procure-to-pay	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 51 → 19 of 87
Supplier management	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 78 → 30 of 111
Spend management platfor	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 23 → 32 of 46
Strategic sourcing	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 107 → 122 of 128

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	3	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	2	4
Kimi K2	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	2	0	0	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct25 labelsNone

Paraphrase13 labels1

Comparative41 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained10 labels3

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative21 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative114 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best if supplier master data / ERP-style governance matters most: Oracle Supplier Management” GPT-5.4 mini · Supplier management · direct prompt · alternative

“Part of the Coupa vs SAP Ariba vs Oracle comparison for full procure-to-pay at enterprise scale” Muse Glimmer 30B · Procure-to-pay · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best For: Organizations already heavily invested in the Oracle ecosystem.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Procure-to-pay · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for Oracle-centric enterprises: Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement” GPT-5.4 mini · Procure-to-pay · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“should avoid heavyweight enterprise legacy platforms (like SAP Ariba or Oracle)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Strategic sourcing · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“not large enough to justify the years-long implementation cycles and $200k+ price tags of enterprise giants like SAP Ariba or Oracle” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Supplier management · scale prompt · soft negative

“you do not need the hyper-complex, heavily-bloated enterprise systems (like SAP Ariba or Oracle)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Procure-to-pay · scale prompt · soft negative

“required to deploy heavy enterprise suites like SAP Ariba or Oracle Procurement Cloud” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Supplier management · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, over the 114 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Coupa108 of 11443Not among the top eight

SAP Ariba108 of 11428Not among the top eight

Ivalua80 of 1149Not among the top eight

GEP SMART58 of 1143Not among the top eight

Jaggaer55 of 1143Not among the top eight

Zip23 of 1141Not among the top eight

Procurify22 of 1142Not among the top eight

Precoro18 of 1146Not among the top eight

Zycus18 of 1140Not among the top eight

Ramp10 of 1142Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 111 of the 114 answers that named Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mindsprint.com45

g2.com42

spendflo.com40

guideflow.com30

gartner.com28

learn.g2.com26

ivalua.com23

gitnux.org22

monday.com21

ramp.com20

297 of the 297 domain citations in answers naming Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/b2b-procurement-platform23

monday.com/blog/project-management/procurement-software-solutions21

zendikt.com/top-10-procurement-software16

spendflo.com/blog/procure-to-pay-software15

guideflow.com/blog/supplier-management-software14

siit.io/blog/best-procurement-software14

whatisbest.com/procurement/sap-ariba-vs-coupa-which-procurement-platform-has-better-erp-in14

gitnux.org/best/procurement-system-software11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

oracle.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement takes 0% of first choices and Procurify takes 42%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “procurement platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “procure-to-pay platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 170 a month (“oracle fusion cloud procurement”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 2 a month
Its company's site: oracle.com shared with Oracle Fusion's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 7,410,638 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 280,257 · 54,144 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 265,940
Paid Google search: 9 searches its ads show for, about 43 clicks and $247 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

101+ ads · 101 text · 101 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2023, as Oracle America, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 37 in the year, 64 before. 19 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 19 of 87 in procure-to-pay

Segment leader

42%

Procurify

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 114 answers
Its own site cited: in 111 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement; a claim can dispute any of them.

Oracle Procurement Cloud 7Oracle 6Oracle Procurement 1Oracle Supplier Management 1

Follow Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Oracle Fusion is the company behind Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Oracle Fusion: Oracle Fusion Assets, Oracle Fusion Cloud Credit Management, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud Financial Management, Oracle Fusion Cloud Financials, Oracle Fusion Cloud Fixed Assets, Oracle Fusion Revenue Management

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: an integrated source-to-settle suite for automating procurement business processes
oracle.com/erp/procurement
For: procurement, finance, operations, supply chain, legal, category management, sourcing, purchasing, supplier management, accounts payable, compliance, sustainability, and executive stakeholder teams
oracle.com/erp/procurement
Certifications: FedRAMP
Customers named: TaylorEtharaGorilla GlueClaytonHSBC
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: marketplace.oracle.com/fusion+applications, oracle.com/erp/procurement, oracle.com/erp/erp-modules, oracle.com/scm/ai-in-procurement, oracle.com/applications/fusion-ai. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.