Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
1 category · Named, not rankedTalentDesk
4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. TalentDesk was named 2 times in Contractor payments, where Tipalti led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market55 of 98
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise20 of 75
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In contractor payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named TalentDesk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contractor payments | Spend and procurement | 0% | 55 of 98 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Tipalti at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, TalentDesk held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Contractor payments · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 49 of 85, unchanged
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 11 → 18 of 70
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contractor payments | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 98, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated TalentDesk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated TalentDesk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TalentDesk, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TalentDesk was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TalentDesk, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TalentDesk was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TalentDesk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named TalentDesk and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
talentdesk.ioYour site4
guideflow.com3
learn.g2.com3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
easystaff.io2
f6s.com2
hr.software2
tipalti.com2
upwork.com2
worksuite.com2
Twenty-one of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming TalentDesk came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
talentdesk.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TalentDesk takes 0% of first choices and Tipalti takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
talentdesk.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TalentDesk takes 0% of first choices and Tipalti takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “contractor payment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “contractor payments and 1099 platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,384 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 924 · 39 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 887
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 55 of 98 in contractor payments
Segment leader
22%
Tipalti
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 4 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 4 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on talentdesk.io
357
subdomains included
Content
165
counted in the table below
Documentation
26
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 116 | 7 | 2026-09-21 | Contractor payments | |
| Case study | 20 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 15 | 0 | 2026-04-07 | ||
| Comparison | 12 | 1 | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2025-10-28 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21Fashion week contractor management blog
- 2026-08-29Contractor management process blog
- 2026-08-20Talentdesk vs remote comparison
- 2026-08-15Best contingent workforce management software blog
- 2026-07-28Blended workforce management blog
- 2026-07-24Best vendor management systems blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page talentdesk.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow TalentDesk
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
TalentDesk is its own company.ShowHide
The company
TalentDesk is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Freelancer management platform for onboarding, managing, paying and staying compliant with freelancers and vendors in 190+ countries and 110+ currencies.
- For
- Businesses managing freelancers, contractors and vendors; global teams; Operations, HR, and Procurement.
- Price stated
- Growth and Enterprise plans with custom pricing. Request a demo for a quote. talentdesk.io
- Free plan or trial
- Book a demo / Book a free demo talentdesk.io
- Integrations claimed
- 8000 talentdesk.io/integrations
- Customers named
- Apartment Therapy MediaEuromonitorLegendCRTCircadiaSchoolKitMemriseDefined.ai
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, certifications, hosting
What TalentDesk's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: talentdesk.io, talentdesk.io/pricing, trust.talentdesk.io, talentdesk.io/customers, talentdesk.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TalentDesk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TalentDesk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TalentDesk by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where TalentDesk is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name TalentDesk, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.