AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › ClickUp · October 2026 Edition
4 categories · Named, not ranked

ClickUp

35Judge labels
1First choices
6Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ClickUp was named 7 times in Corporate performance ma and 3 other categories, where Planful led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ClickUp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Corporate performance managementPlanning and analysis2%15 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Professional services automationReceivables and billing0%21 of 990%3under 10 labels · led by BigTime at 29%
Financial reporting and dashboardsPlanning and analysis0%46 of 1050%2under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Financial close managementAccounting and close0%30 of 850%1under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 55%goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

Movement

Since September 2026, ClickUp held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Corporate performance ma · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 50 → 32 of 101
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 36 → 13 of 91
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Corporate performance ma0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 36 → 15 of 99
PSA0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 21 of 99, unchanged
Financial reporting0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 67 → 46 of 105
Financial close manageme0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 38 → 30 of 85

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated ClickUp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00202
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative16 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with a free tier of ClickUp or Asana to set up projects, tasks, and budgets.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · first choice
“use ClickUp's free plan for recurring close tasks... It's a general project-management tool, not accounting-specific close software” GPT-6 Luna · Financial close manageme · budget prompt · alternative
“the cheapest broad-workflow option if you can accept lighter PSA depth” Perplexity Sonar · PSA · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for Flexibility & "Good Enough" PSA: ClickUp” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PSA · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ClickUp, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClickUp was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Monday.com18 of 350Not among the top eight
Asana14 of 351Not among the top eight
Scoro10 of 350Not among the top eight
BigTime8 of 353Not among the top eight
Wrike8 of 350Not among the top eight
Kantata7 of 351Not among the top eight
Teamwork.com7 of 351Not among the top eight
Productive6 of 353Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power BI6 of 352Not among the top eight
Trello6 of 351Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ClickUp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 35 answers that named ClickUp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

clickup.comYour site14
g2.com13
thedigitalprojectmanager.com12
bigtime.net9
larksuite.com9
teamwork.com9
capterra.com8
softwaresuggest.com8
wrike.com8
monday.com7

Eighty-three of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming ClickUp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

clickup.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ClickUp takes 2% of first choices and Planful takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “epm software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “epm platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
201,000 a month (“clickup”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1,733 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 322,021 a month
Searches its site ranks for
117,331 · 942 in the top three
Sites linking to it
59,880
Paid Google search
5 searches its ads show for, about 55 clicks and $1,470 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 90 text, 30 video · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2023, as Mango Technologies, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 28 in the year, 92 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 15 of 99 in corporate performance ma
Segment leader
22%
Planful
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
35 answers
Its own site cited
in 32 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on clickup.com
76,085
subdomains included
Content
20,804
counted in the table below
Documentation
209
Product · Integration
419 · 56
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog15,947undated
Template or tool2,33302026-04-08
Comparison1,978undated
Conference or event241undated
Report or ebook8502026-04-03
Case study7402025-11-07
Webinar or virtual event5902025-05-09
Podcast or video4802026-03-15
News or press2402025-11-22
Glossary or explainer1522026-09-11

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page clickup.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow ClickUp

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ClickUp is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
project management software designed to revolutionize the way people work with features including tasks, whiteboards, spreadsheets, and document collaboration on a unified platform
For
teams
Price stated
Free forever. No credit card. clickup.com
Starting price
7 clickup.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Free forever. No credit card. clickup.com
Integrations claimed
50 clickup.com/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 TYPE IIISO 27001GDPRHIPAASOC 2SOC 2 CERTIFIEDISO 27001 CERTIFIEDGDPR COMPLIANT
Hosting
US, EU & APACIrelandAustraliaSingaporethe United StatesUSEuropeanAsia Pacific
Customers named
SiemensSeismicBell DirectCartoon NetworkFinastraOvative GroupVaynerXChick-fil-A

What ClickUp's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: clickup.com, clickup.com/pricing, clickup.com/security, clickup.com/features/ai, clickup.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ClickUp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ClickUp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ClickUp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ClickUp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ClickUp, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at clickup.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.