Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 62 → 22 of 116
2 categories · Named, not rankedTIS
16Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. TIS was named 7 times in Treasury management syst and 1 other category, where Trovata led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market25 of 124
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise78 of 90
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named TIS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management systems | Treasury and cash | 2% | 25 of 124 | 33% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 28% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Payment orchestration platforms | Receivables and billing | 0% | 70 of 81 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BlueSnap at 18% |
Movement
Since September 2026, TIS held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Treasury management syst · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 19 → 80 of 82
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treasury management syst | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 62 → 25 of 124 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated TIS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated TIS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“GTreasury or TIS would be the top recommendations” MiniMax M2.5 · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · first choice
“Payment and bank-connectivity challenge: look closely at TIS.” GPT-6 Luna · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“TIS is narrower in scope and primarily serves as a payment hub. It may not be suitable for organizations seeking a full-featured treasury management system.” Mistral Small · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · soft negative
“TIS and Coupa Treasury are narrower, payment-hub-first choices rather than full treasury platforms.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TIS, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TIS was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as TIS, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TIS was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TIS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named TIS and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com7
eco.com6
finantrix.com6
myhospitalnow.com6
tispayments.com6
checkthat.ai5
debtbook.com5
kyriba.com5
eftsure.com4
gartner.com4
Fifty-four of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming TIS came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cygnetise.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TIS takes 2% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cygnetise.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TIS takes 2% of first choices and Trovata takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “treasury management system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “treasury management systems”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 49,500 a month (“tis”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 161,500 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,148 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 264 · 25 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 503
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 25 of 124 in treasury management syst
Segment leader
28%
Trovata
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cygnetise.com
301
subdomains included
Content
218
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 178 | 0 | 2026-02-12 | Entity management | |
| News or press | 28 | 0 | 2025-09-11 | ||
| Podcast or video | 4 | 0 | 2024-12-05 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | 0 | 2018-07-19 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2023-09-14 | ||
| Case study | 1 | 0 | 2026-02-12 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2020-11-19 |
Most recent
- 2026-02-12Treasury governance and signatory management blog
- 2026-02-12Customer stories case study
- 2026-01-15Offboarding fail authorised signatory blog
- 2025-12-22Entity management software and authorised signatory blog
- 2025-12-16Authorised signatory governance risk blog
- 2025-12-10Most overlooked governance failure of 2025 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cygnetise.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as TIS
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TIS; a claim can dispute any of them.
TIS (Treasury Intelligence Solutions) 3
Follow TIS
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
TIS is its own company.ShowHide
The company
TIS is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 27001
- Customers named
- Evelyn PartnersStonehage FlemingVistraEFGWTWTipaltiEngieNetwork Rail
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What TIS's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: cygnetise.com, cygnetise.com/pricing-request, cygnetise.com/security, cygnetise.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TIS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TIS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TIS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where TIS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name TIS, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.