AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Trustpair · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Trustpair

23Judge labels
15First choices
0Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
24% in Ecommerce fraud for enterprise buyers
Rank 9 of 70 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In ecommerce fraud · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Trustpair for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Ecommerce fraud preventionReceivables and billing4%9 of 700%5under 10 labels · led by SEON at 16%
Supplier managementSpend and procurement0%68 of 1110%1under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trustpair yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trustpair across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels3
Paraphrase19 labels12
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Eftsure or Trustpair would be ideal” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Ecommerce fraud · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Trustpair” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Ecommerce fraud · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best if fraud prevention/bank validation is the top pain point: Trustpair” GPT-5.4 mini · Supplier management · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose Trustpair if you have significant international vendor relationships” Kimi K2 · Ecommerce fraud · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trustpair, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trustpair was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Eftsure12 of 233Not among the top eight
Sift12 of 231Not among the top eight
Feedzai6 of 230Not among the top eight
Forter6 of 230Not among the top eight
FraudNet5 of 231Not among the top eight
Signifyd4 of 231Not among the top eight
Stripe Radar4 of 231Not among the top eight
Trustmi3 of 232Not among the top eight
Kount3 of 230Not among the top eight
SEON3 of 230Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trustpair. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Trustpair and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

trustpair.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Trustpair takes 4% of first choices and SEON takes 16%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ecommerce fraud prevention platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ecommerce fraud prevention platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
720 a month (“trustpair”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
10 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 13,654 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,243 · 163 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,648
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
8 ads · 5 image, 3 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2025, as TRUSTPAIR INC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 6 in the year, 2 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 9 of 70 in ecommerce fraud
Segment leader
16%
SEON
First choices
15 across its categories
Named in
23 answers
Its own site cited
in 23 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on trustpair.com
1,441
subdomains included
Content
804
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
8 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog710222026-10-05Procure-to-pay, Supplier management
Glossary or explainer3702026-06-30
Comparison1942026-09-04
Report or ebook1202024-08-02
Webinar or virtual event802025-10-03Supplier management
News or press802026-01-27
Conference or event712026-09-30
Template or tool302026-05-27

Events in person

Upcoming

As the event pages on trustpair.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page trustpair.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name procure-to-pay (11); 8 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Trustpair

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Trustpair is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Vendor Fraud Prevention Platform; leading Payment Fraud Prevention and Account Validation Platform
For
Procure-to-Pay teams, CFO, Treasury, Account Payables, Procurement, Master Data Management, P2P Teams, Information Security, Global Business Services
Price stated
Get A Quote trustpair.com/pricing
Integrations claimed
20 trustpair.com · 150 trustpair.com/platform pages disagree
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2SOC 1 Type 2ISO 27001
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting, customers

What Trustpair's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: trustpair.com, trustpair.com/pricing, trust.trustpair.com, trustpair.com/platform. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trustpair's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trustpair, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trustpair by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Trustpair is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trustpair, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trustpair.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.