Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 76 of 94, unchanged
Wolters Kluwer · 2 categories · Named, not rankedWolters Kluwer CCH Integrator
7Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator was named 3 times in Corporate tax provision and 1 other category, where Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market70 of 102
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise9 of 95
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
In corporate tax provision · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate tax provision | Tax and compliance | 0% | 70 of 102 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Transfer pricing | Tax and compliance | 0% | 42 of 101 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by TPGenie at 30% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate tax provision · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate tax provision | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 70 of 102, unchanged |
| Transfer pricing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 101, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative3 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For large, global teams needing a full suite: Thomson Reuters or Wolters Kluwer.” Mistral Small · Transfer pricing · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
tax.thomsonreuters.com4
wolterskluwer.comYour site4
commenda.io2
finance.toolsinfo.com2
findalternatives.net2
g2.com2
getsphere.com2
sourceforge.net2
tax.thomsonreuters.co.uk2
thecfoclub.com2
Twenty of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
wolterskluwer.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator takes 0% of first choices and Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
wolterskluwer.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator takes 0% of first choices and Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “tax provision tools”
5
Position for “corporate tax provision software”
6
- Its company's site
- wolterskluwer.com shared with Wolters Kluwer's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,373,906 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 117,664 · 13,778 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 46,626
- Paid Google search
- 19 searches its ads show for, about 1,183 clicks and $15,481 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 70 of 102 in corporate tax provision
Segment leader
21%
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 7 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Wolters Kluwer is the company behind Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator.ShowHide
The company
Wolters Kluwer is the company behind Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Wolters Kluwer
- Wolters Kluwer CCH Axcess, Wolters Kluwer CCH SureTax, Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik, Wolters Kluwer Legisway, Wolters Kluwer's CCH SureTax
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- an integrated cloud-based platform designed to help organisations simplify their tax management, compliance, reporting and provisioning
- For
- tax leaders
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/cch-integrator. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Wolters Kluwer CCH Integrator, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.