Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
Wolters Kluwer · 1 category · Named, not rankedWolters Kluwer Legisway
8Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Wolters Kluwer Legisway was named 2 times in Entity management, where Athennian led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market43 of 81
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise16 of 89
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Wolters Kluwer Legisway for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity management | Equity and corporate | 0% | 43 of 81 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Wolters Kluwer Legisway held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Entity management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 62 → 41 of 79
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 7 → 16 of 77
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entity management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 62 → 43 of 81 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Wolters Kluwer Legisway across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Wolters Kluwer Legisway across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Wolters Kluwer Legisway, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wolters Kluwer Legisway was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Wolters Kluwer Legisway, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wolters Kluwer Legisway was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wolters Kluwer Legisway. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Wolters Kluwer Legisway and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
discern.com6
verifiedmarketresearch.com6
wolterskluwer.comYour site5
softwareadvice.com4
athennian.com3
commenda.io3
coverpin.com3
diliforce.com3
diligent.com3
dilitrust.com3
Thirty-four of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Wolters Kluwer Legisway came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
wolterskluwer.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Wolters Kluwer Legisway takes 0% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.ShowHide
Search and answers
wolterskluwer.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Wolters Kluwer Legisway takes 0% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “entity management tools”
6
Position for “legal entity management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“wolters kluwer legisway”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its company's site
- wolterskluwer.com shared with Wolters Kluwer's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,373,906 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 117,664 · 13,778 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 46,626
- Paid Google search
- 19 searches its ads show for, about 1,183 clicks and $15,481 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 43 of 81 in entity management
Segment leader
41%
Athennian
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 8 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Wolters Kluwer Legisway
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wolters Kluwer Legisway; a claim can dispute any of them.
Legisway 2
Follow Wolters Kluwer Legisway
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Wolters Kluwer is the company behind Wolters Kluwer Legisway.ShowHide
The company
Wolters Kluwer is the company behind Wolters Kluwer Legisway.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIs this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wolters Kluwer Legisway's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wolters Kluwer Legisway, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Wolters Kluwer Legisway by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Wolters Kluwer Legisway is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Wolters Kluwer Legisway, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.