AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik · October 2026 Edition
Wolters Kluwer · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik

2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik was named 1 time in Disclosure reporting, where Workiva led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In disclosure reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SEC and disclosure reportingAccounting and close0%39 of 630%1under 10 labels · led by Workiva at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Finance-suite / consolidation-first approach: Wolters Kluwer / Tagetik” GPT-5.4 mini · Disclosure reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
OneStream1 of 21Not among the top eight
Workiva1 of 21Not among the top eight
Anaplan1 of 20Not among the top eight
Diligent1 of 20Not among the top eight
Oracle1 of 20Not among the top eight
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM1 of 20Not among the top eight
Oracle NetSuite1 of 20Not among the top eight
Planful1 of 20Not among the top eight
SAP1 of 20Not among the top eight
Sage Intacct1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wolterskluwer.comYour site2
basedash.com1
bizbot.com1
cubesoftware.com1
drivetrain.ai1
erpresearch.com1
fiscalchimp.com1
fitsmallbusiness.com1
freshbooks.com1
gartner.com1

Nine of the eleven domain citations in answers naming Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

wolterskluwer.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik takes 0% of first choices and Workiva takes 32%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sec and disclosure reporting platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sec and disclosure reporting platform”
–
not in the top ten
Its company's site
wolterskluwer.com shared with Wolters Kluwer's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 2,373,906 a month
Searches its site ranks for
117,664 · 13,778 in the top three
Sites linking to it
46,626
Paid Google search
19 searches its ads show for, about 1,183 clicks and $15,481 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
28+ ads · 12 text, 8 image, 8 video · 28 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as UpToDate, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 20 in the year, 8 before. 92 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 39 of 63 in disclosure reporting
Segment leader
32%
Workiva
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
2 answers
Its own site cited
in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik; a claim can dispute any of them.
Wolters Kluwer / CCH Tagetik 1

Follow Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Wolters Kluwer is the company behind Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered software for extended planning, financial close and consolidation, and regulatory including corporate tax and sustainability.
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: wolterskluwer.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wolterskluwer.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.