Small business▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 8 → 18 of 77
2 categories · Named, not rankedYounium
30Judge labels
3First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Younium was named 7 times in Revenue recognition and 1 other category, where Maxio led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business18 of 79
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market17 of 77
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise6 of 65
4%8 labels
under the label threshold
In revenue recognition · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Younium for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue recognition | Accounting and close | 2% | 17 of 77 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 20% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SaaS metrics and analytics | Planning and analysis | 0% | 27 of 78 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Younium held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Revenue recognition · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 24 → 15 of 74
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 5 of 62, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue recognition | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 17 of 77 |
| SaaS metrics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 27 of 78, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Younium across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Younium across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labelsNone
Paraphrase9 labels2
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Younium is built for B2B companies that sell subscriptions or services and helps record revenue at the correct time” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Revenue recognition · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Built specifically for B2B subscription companies with flexible pricing, multi-entity structures” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Revenue recognition · direct prompt · alternative
“Younium is a strong contender, especially if you don’t yet need full ASC 606 support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SaaS metrics · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you're a subscription-specific company → Younium” MiniMax M2.5 · Revenue recognition · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Younium, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Younium was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Younium, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Younium was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Younium. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Younium and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
younium.comYour site27
fueler.io15
guideflow.com15
hubifi.com12
ledgerup.ai11
zenskar.com11
rightrev.com10
wise.com10
getapp.com6
tabs.com6
Ninety-six of the 123 domain citations in answers naming Younium came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
younium.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Younium takes 2% of first choices and Maxio takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
younium.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Younium takes 2% of first choices and Maxio takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “revenue recognition tools”
8
Position for “revenue recognition software”
5
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“younium”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,700 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 551 · 11 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,302
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 17 of 77 in revenue recognition
Segment leader
20%
Maxio
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 30 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 30 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on younium.com
320
subdomains included
Content
190
counted in the table below
Documentation
74
Product · Integration
26 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 132 | 6 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Comparison | 17 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 14 | undated | |||
| News or press | 14 | 1 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 1 | 2026-08-28 | ||
| Case study | 3 | 0 | 2025-03-19 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22E invoicing format vs system comparison
- 2026-09-21Frances e invoicing mandate blog
- 2026-09-18Younium crosses sek 100m in contracted arr while growing revenue 30 news or press
- 2026-09-16Platform vs point solution billing tool comparison
- 2026-09-09Ai agents subscription management blog
- 2026-08-28What is subscription billing glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page younium.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Younium
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Younium is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Younium is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- subscription management & billing platform for running a scalable B2B subscription business
- For
- B2B subscription businesses
- Integrations claimed
- 20 younium.com
- Certifications
- ISOSOCIFRS 15ASC 606
- Hosting
- EuropeUnited States
- Customers named
- KognityiBinder
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial
What Younium's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: younium.com, trust.younium.com, younium.com/platform/mcp. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Younium's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Younium, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Younium by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Younium is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Younium, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.