Eleven of fourteen models named Navan first on the direct prompt; zero named Booking.com for Business. Navan was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Booking.com for Business by twelve and Navan carries 67 labels and Booking.com for Business 28, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the corporate travel management page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Navan and Booking.com for Business were named in the same answer sixty-three times, of the 320 answers naming Navan and the 81 naming Booking.com for Business. In those answers Booking.com for Business took the first choice thirteen times and Navan twenty-nine.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“these are the travel management platforms that consistently draw the most cautionary feedback: ### Navan, formerly TripActions” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“generally well reviewed, but some users complain about higher-than-direct booking prices, booking/approval friction, and support issues” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some users have reported booking confusion, excessive steps, miscommunication, and untrustworthy reservation confirmations.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some of the top options include Navan, Perk, and Routespring, which offer all-in-one platforms with AI-powered booking, expense automation, and 24/7 support.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with 3 vendors: One modern (Navan or TravelPerk)... modern all-in-one platforms (Navan, TravelPerk, Spotnana) typically beat legacy TMCs on UX” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“Best for mid-market companies 50-300+ employees that want a modern, all-in-one travel and expense platform with a consumer-grade interface.” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Consumer booking sites like Expedia or Booking.com used as a business travel system ... generally lack policy enforcement” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“PissedConsumer rates them low (1.6-1.9/5) for refunds and support—avoid for corporate needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“their financial handling is often cited as problematic” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“the strongest default choice is Booking.com for Business because it is positioned as a free, self-service business travel platform” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“praised for being a free, self-service tool that minimizes costs while still providing robust travel booking and management features” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For a limited budget, Booking.com for Business and Perk are often the most cost-effective and user-friendly options” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.